...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Assessment of Periodontal Health Status in Smokers and Smokeless Tobacco Users: A Cross-Sectional Study
【24h】

Assessment of Periodontal Health Status in Smokers and Smokeless Tobacco Users: A Cross-Sectional Study

机译：吸烟者和无烟烟草使用者牙周健康状况的评估：一项跨部门研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction: Oral smokeless tobacco consumption has been considered as a major risk factor for oral cancer, its role as a risk factor for periodontal disease is less well documented when compared to that of relationship between smoking and periodontal disease. Aim: The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effect of various forms of tobacco consumption i.e., smoking and smokeless tobacco forms on periodontal status. Materials and Methods: The study population included 120 subjects with the habit of tobacco consumption, based on form of tobacco use they were divided into Group 1 (smoking), Group 2 (Smokeless tobacco), and Group 3 (smokers and smokeless tobacco users). The periodontal status for each group was evaluated by measuring Oral Hygiene Index- Simplified (OHI-S) and Community Periodontal Index (CPI) for Probing Depth (CPI-PD) and Attachment Loss (CPI-AL). Results: OHI-S mean scores in Group 1 (3.53±1.03), Group 2 (3.06±0.92) and Group 3 (3.45±0.96) were similar, which were not statistically significant (p>0.076). The mean values of CPI-PD were 3.75±0.44 in Group 1, 3.65±0.48 in Group 2, 3.80±0.41 in Group 3 with no significant difference between the three Groups (p> 0.309). When the mean values of CPI-AL (0.95±0.75 in Group 1, 1.40±0.74 in group 2, and 1.55±0.60 in Group 3) were compared in between the Groups, a statistically significant difference was observed in Group 3 (p<0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that tobacco consumption in both forms caused poor periodontal status, with smokeless tobacco users having more amount of attachment loss than smokers.
机译：简介：口服无烟烟草已被认为是口腔癌的主要危险因素，与吸烟与牙周疾病之间的关系相比，其作为牙周疾病危险因素的作用尚不充分。目的：本横断面研究的目的是评估各种烟草消费形式（即吸烟和无烟烟草形式）对牙周状况的影响。材料和方法：研究人群包括120名具有吸烟习惯的受试者，根据吸烟习惯将他们分为第一组（吸烟），第二组（无烟烟草）和第三组（吸烟者和无烟烟草使用者）。 。通过测量简化的口腔卫生指数（OHI-S）和探测深度的社区牙周指数（CPI）（CPI-PD）和附着丧失（CPI-AL）来评估每组的牙周状态。结果：第1组（3.53±1.03），第2组（3.06±0.92）和第3组（3.45±0.96）的OHI-S平均评分相似，但无统计学意义（p> 0.076）。第一组的CPI-PD平均值为3.75±0.44，第二组的平均值为3.65±0.48，第三组的平均值为3.80±0.41，三组之间无显着性差异（p> 0.309）。比较各组之间的CPI-AL平均值（第1组为0.95±0.75，第2组为1.40±0.74，第3组为1.55±0.60），在第3组中观察到统计学显着性差异（p < 0.001）。结论：结果表明，两种形式的烟草消费都会导致牙周状况不佳，无烟烟草使用者的附着力损失比吸烟者大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号