...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice
【24h】

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice

机译:与梗阻性黄疸患者相比,MRCP与超声/ CT的诊断准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The expanding spectrum of therapeutic options for patients with surgical jaundice makes it necessary for the radiologist to precisely assess the etiology, location, level and extent of disease.Aim:To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with Ultrasound and Computed Tomography (CT) in evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice taking direct cholangiographies (ERCP and PTC), hystologic tests and anatomo-pathological findings after surgical intervention as gold standard.Settings anddesign:This prospective study included 50 patients who were referred to the radiology department with clinical features of biliary obstructive disease.Materials and Methods:Initial ultrasonography (USG) evaluation was followed by Computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP);however in cases of benign pathologies where USG findings were unequivocal Computed tomography (CT )was not done to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure. The results were read by radiologists blinded to other imaging findings. The characteristic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) features/ histopathological diagnosis / surgical findings (as applicable) were considered as final.Results:Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP (98%) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant diseases was relatively high (98% and 98%) as compared to CT (82.86% and 91.43% in benign and malignant respectively) and USG (88% and 88%). In the diagnosis of benign diseases MRCP was 100% sensitive compared to ultrasound (80.77%), which was more sensitive than CT scan (54.55%).In the diagnosis of malignant diseases, MRCP was more sensitive (95.83%) as compared to CT scan (91.67%), which was more sensitive than ultrasonography (79.17%).conclusion:Ultrasound as a screening modality is useful to confirm or exclude biliary dilatation and to choose patients for MRCP examination. MRCP is an important non invasive imaging investigation in the pre operative evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice.
机译:背景:手术性黄疸患者的治疗选择范围不断扩大,放射线医师有必要精确评估病因,位置,水平和范围。目的:比较磁共振胆胰管成像(MRCP)和超声检查的诊断准确性计算机断层扫描(CT)用于评估直接介入胆管造影(ERCP和PTC)的梗阻性黄疸患者,手术干预后的体格检查和解剖病理学发现为金标准。设置与设计:这项前瞻性研究包括50例经放射学检查的患者材料与方法:先行超声检查(USG),然后进行计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振胆胰胰管造影(MRCP);但是,对于良性病理情况,如果USG表现明确,计算机断层扫描(CT) )没有做以避免不必要的辐射离子暴露。放射线医师不知道其他影像学发现而读取了结果。内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的特征/组织病理学诊断/手术结果(如适用)被认为是最终的。结果:MRCP在良性和恶性疾病诊断中的诊断准确性较高(98%和98) %(CT)(良性和恶性分别为82.86%和91.43%)和USG(88%和88%)。在良性疾病的诊断中,MRCP比超声检查(80.77%)敏感度为100%,比CT扫描(54.55%)敏感;在恶性疾病的诊断中,MRCP的敏感性比CT敏感度(95.83%)超声检查(91.67%),比超声检查(79.17%)更为敏感。结论:超声检查作为筛查方式可用于确认或排除胆道扩张以及选择患者进行MRCP检查。 MRCP是梗阻性黄疸患者术前评估的重要非侵入性影像学检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号