首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Respiratory Research >Characterisation of ICU sleep by a commercially available activity tracker and its agreement with patient-perceived sleep quality
【24h】

Characterisation of ICU sleep by a commercially available activity tracker and its agreement with patient-perceived sleep quality

机译:商业上可用的活动跟踪仪对ICU睡眠的特征及其与患者感知睡眠质量的协议

获取原文
           

摘要

Background A low-cost, quantitative method to evaluate sleep in the intensive care unit (ICU) that is both feasible for routine clinical practice and reliable does not yet exist. We characterised nocturnal ICU sleep using a commercially available activity tracker and evaluated agreement between tracker-derived sleep data and patient-perceived sleep quality.Patients and methods A prospective cohort study was performed in a 40-bed ICU at a community teaching hospital. An activity tracker (Fitbit Charge 2) was applied for up to 7 ICU days in English-speaking adults with an anticipated ICU stay ≥2 days and without mechanical ventilation, sleep apnoea, delirium, continuous sedation, contact isolation or recent anaesthesia. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) was administered each morning by a trained investigator.Results Available activity tracker-derived data for each ICU study night (20:00–09:00) (total sleep time (TST), number of awakenings (#AW), and time spent light sleep, deep sleep and rapid?eye movement (REM) sleep) were downloaded and analysed. Across the 232 evaluated nights (76 patients), TST and RCSQ data were available for 232 (100%), #AW data for 180 (78%) and sleep stage data for 73 (31%). Agreement between TST (349±168 min) and RCSQ Score was moderate and significant (r=0.34; 95%?CI 0.18 to 0.48). Agreement between #AW (median (IQR), 4 (2–9)) and RCSQ Score was negative and non-significant (r=?0.01; 95%?CI ?0.19 to 0.14). Agreement between time (min) spent in light (259 (182 to 328)), deep (43±29), and REM (47 (28–72)) sleep and RCSQ Score was moderate but non-significant (light (r=0.44, 95%?CI ?0.05 to 0.36); deep sleep (r=0.44, 95%?CI ?0.11 to 0.15) and REM sleep (r=0.44; 95%?CI ?0.21 to 0.21)).Conclusions A Fitbit Charge 2 when applied to non-intubated adults in an ICU consistently collects TST data but not #AW or sleep stage data at night. The TST moderately correlates with patient-perceived sleep quality; a correlation between either #AW or sleep stages and sleep quality was not found.
机译:背景技术在重症监护室(ICU)中评估睡眠的低成本,定量方法,这对于常规临床实践和可靠的可靠性既有可行的。我们使用市售的活动跟踪器来表征夜间ICU睡眠,并在跟踪器衍生的睡眠数据和患者感知睡眠质量之间进行评估协议.Patients和方法在社区教学医院的40床ICU中进行了预期队列研究。活动跟踪器(FITBit Charge 2)在英语成年人中申请了最多7个ICU天,预计ICU停留≥2天,没有机械通风,睡眠呼吸暂停,谵妄,连续镇静,接触隔离或最近麻醉。 Richards-Campbell睡眠问卷调查问卷(RCSQ)由训练有素的调查员每天早上进行。结果可用活动活动跟踪器派对派对派对夜间(20:00-09:00)(总睡眠时间(TST),唤醒数量(#AW),下载并分析了睡眠时间光睡眠,深睡眠和快速?眼球运动(REM)睡眠)。在232名评估的夜晚(76名患者),TST和RCSQ数据可用于232(100%),#AW数据为180(78%),睡眠阶段数据73(31%)。 TST(349±168分钟)和RCSQ评分之间的协议中等且显着(r = 0.34; 95%?CI 0.18至0.48)。 #AW之间的协议(中位数(IQR),4(2-9))和RCSQ得分为负和非显着(R = 0.01; 95%?CI?0.19至0.14)。在光线下花费的时间(分钟)(259(182至328)),深(43±29)和REM(47(28-72))睡眠,RCSQ得分为温和但非显着(光(r = 0.44,95%?CI?0.05至0.36);深睡眠(r = 0.44,95%?ci?0.11至0.15)和REM睡眠(r = 0.44; 95%?ci?0.21至0.21))。结论一个合适的it在ICU中应用于非插管成年人时,Charge 2始终收集TST数据但不会在晚上收集#AW或睡眠阶段数据。 TST适度地与患者感知睡眠质量相关;找不到#AW或睡眠阶段与睡眠质量之间的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号