• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards
【24h】

The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards

机译：医学教育中的H型指数：医学教育杂志编辑委员会分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Disciplines differ in their authorship and citation practices, thus discipline-specific h-index norms are desirable. Thus the goal of this study was to examine the relationship between the h-index and academic rank in the field of medical education, and the differences in the h-index between MD’s and PhD’s in this field. Methods Due to the absence of a formalized registry of medical educators, we sampled available editorial board membership (considered a proxy for identifying ‘career’ medical educators) to establish h-index values. These were determined using Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar (GS), and internet searching was used to determine their academic rank. The correlation between authors’ h-indices derived from WoS and GS was also determined. Results 130 editors were identified (95 full professors, 21 associate professors, 14 assistant professors). A significant difference was noted between the h-indices of full professors and associate/assistant professors (p?h-indices of MD’s and PhD’s did not differ significantly. Moderate correlation between GS and WOS h-indices was noted R?=?0.46, p? Conclusions The results provide some guidance as to the expected h-indices of a select group of medical educators. No differences appear to exist between assistant professor and associate professor ranks or between MD’s and PhD’s.
机译：背景技术纪律在他们的作者和引用实践中有所不同，因此需要纪律的H型指数规范。因此，本研究的目标是研究医学教育领域的H型指数和学术级别之间的关系，以及MD和博士学位在该领域之间的H形指数的差异。方法由于缺乏医学教育者的正式注册管理机构，我们提供了可用的编辑委员会成员（被视为识别“职业生涯”医疗教育者）建立H-Index价值的代表。这些是使用Science（WOS）和Google Scholar（GS）的网络确定的，并且互联网搜索用于确定他们的学术级别。还确定了来自WOS和GS的作者H-Indices之间的相关性。结果130名编辑被确定（95名全教授，21名副教授，14名助理教授）。在完整教授和助理/助理教授的H-Indices之间注意到了一个重要差异（P？H-Indice的MD和PHD没有显着差异。注意到GS和WOS H-Indices之间的中等相关性R？=？0.46， P？结论结果向选择一组医疗教育工作者的预期H档提供了一些指导。助理教授和副教授之间或MD和博士之间没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号