...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members.
【24h】

Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members.

机译：麻醉期刊编辑委员会成员的文献计量分析：期刊影响因子与其委员会成员的中位h指数之间的相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: h-index is useful for quantifying scholarly activity in medicine, but this statistic has not been extensively applied as a measure of productivity in anaesthesia. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of h-index in editorial board members and tested the hypothesis that editorial board members of anaesthesia journals with higher impact factors (IFs) have higher h-indices. METHODS: Ten of 19 journals with 2009 IF>1 were randomly chosen from Journal Citation Reports((R)). Board members were identified using each journal's website. Publications, citations, citations per publication, and h-index for each member were obtained using Scopus((R)). RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-three individuals filled 481 anaesthesia editorial board positions. The median h-index of all editorial board members was 14. Board members published 75 papers (median) with 1006 citations and 13 citations per publication. Members serving on journals with IF greater than median had significantly (P<0.05; Wilcoxon's rank-sum test) greater median h-index, citations, and citations per publication than those at journals with IF less than median. A significant correlation between the median h-index of a journal's editorial board members and its IF (h-index=3.01xIF+6.85; r( 2)=0.452; P=0.033) was observed for the 10 journals examined. Board members of subspeciality-specific journals had bibliometric indices that were less than those at general journals. The h-index was greater in individuals serving more than one journal. European editorial board members had higher h-index values than their American colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that editorial board members of anaesthesia journals with higher IFs have higher h-indices.
机译：背景：h指数可用于量化医学领域的学术活动，但该统计尚未广泛应用于麻醉的生产率测量。我们对编辑委员会成员的h指数进行了文献计量分析，并检验了以下假设：影响因子（IFs）较高的麻醉期刊的编辑委员会成员h指数较高。方法：从Journal Citation Reports（R）中随机选择2009 IF> 1的19种期刊中的10种。通过每个期刊的网站确定董事会成员。使用Scopus（R）获得每个成员的出版物，引用，每个出版物的引用和h指数。结果：423位患者担任了麻醉编辑委员会的481个职位。所有编辑委员会成员的h指数中位数为14。委员会成员发表了75篇论文（中值），被引用1006次，每个出版物13次。在IF大于中位数的期刊上任职的成员的平均h指数，引文和每个出版物的引文明显高于IF小于中位数的期刊（P <0.05; Wilcoxon秩和检验）。在所检查的10种期刊中，观察到期刊编辑委员会成员的h指数中位数与其IF之间的显着相关性（h-index = 3.01xIF + 6.85; r（2）= 0.452; P = 0.033）。特定专业类期刊的董事会成员的书目索引低于一般期刊。服务多个期刊的个人的h指数更高。欧洲编辑委员会成员的h指数值高于美国同事。结论：结果表明，IF值较高的麻醉学期刊的编委会成员具有较高的h指数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号