...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >The Effect of Static Stretching, Mini-Band Warm-Ups, Medicine-Ball Warm-Ups, and a Light Jogging Warm-Up on Common Athletic Ability Tests
【24h】

The Effect of Static Stretching, Mini-Band Warm-Ups, Medicine-Ball Warm-Ups, and a Light Jogging Warm-Up on Common Athletic Ability Tests

机译：静态拉伸，迷你带预热，医药球预热的影响，以及对常见运动能力测试的浅慢跑

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 13(4): 298-311, 2020. Proper warm-up is important for facilitating peak athletic performance and reducing injury risk; yet, warm-up procedures vary considerably amongst coaches and athletes. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a static stretching, medicine-ball, and mini-band warm-ups relative to a light jogging warm-up only on athletic ability test performance. It was hypothesized that static stretching would negatively affect performance, while medicine-ball and mini-band warm-ups would positively affect performance relative to light jogging only. Twelve female collegiate soccer players (19.3 ± 1.2y, 65.2 ± 7.5kg, 1.67 ± 0.07m) participated in this study. Athletes completed each warm-up protocol and all of the athletic performance tests over four sessions in a semi-randomized, counterbalanced order. An omnibus MANOVA with vertical jump height, medicine ball throw distance, 10m and 20m sprint time, and T-test time as the dependent variables was not significant indicating that warm up did not have an effect on subsequent athletic ability test performance [Wilks’ λ = 0.64, F(15,110) = 1.28, p= 0.23, η2= 0.14]. Static stretching warm-up did not negatively influence athletic potential compared to mini-band and medicine ball warm-ups, though the most optimal warm-up is likely athlete specific.
机译：国际运动科学杂志13（4）：298-311,2020。适当的预热对于促进高峰运动表现和降低伤害风险非常重要;然而，预热程序在教练和运动员之间有很大差异。本研究的目的是评估静态拉伸，药球和迷你带预热相对于浅慢跑的效果，只针对运动能力测试性能。它假设静态拉伸会对性能产生负面影响，而药球和迷你带预热将对相对于浅跑慢的表现产生积极影响。十二名女大学足球运动员（19.3±1.2y，65.2±7.5kg，1.67±0.07米）参加了这项研究。运动员在半随机的平衡顺序完成了每次预热协议和所有运动性能测试。综合跳跃高度的综合法距离，医学球扔距离，10m和20m冲刺时间，以及作为依赖变量的T型试验时间并不重要，表明预热没有对随后的运动能力测试性能效果[wilk'λ = 0.64，f（15,110）= 1.28，p = 0.23，η2= 0.14]。与迷你带和药球预热相比，静态拉伸预热并没有对运动潜力产生负面影响，尽管最佳的热身可能是特定的运动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号