• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Business and Management >The Stressful Implications of Remote E-Working: Evidence from Europe
【24h】

The Stressful Implications of Remote E-Working: Evidence from Europe

机译：远程电子工作的压力含量：来自欧洲的证据

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper investigates the importance of different modes of spatial flexibility as well as of the distinction between autonomy and discretion to find plausible explanations of the so-called autonomy paradox, which maintains that the more the job autonomy that remote e-workers have the greater the effort they put into their work with adverse effects on work-related stress. Using multiple regressions, we test the hypotheses regarding the direct influence of autonomy, discretion and work intensification as well as their interaction effects on occupational stress in two subsamples of 1.380 home-based e-workers and 2.574 mobile ones drawn from the 2015 European Working Conditions Survey. The main findings are as follows. Home-based e-workers perceive that autonomy (namely over work goals) directly decreases occupational stress and buffers work intensification (i.e. autonomy over work goals and in the organizational choices of their department/company). In the context of remote e-work, discretion is more likely to boost the stressful impact of work intensification when work is mobile. At the same time, we do not find that autonomy increases work intensification, neither among mobile e-workers, nor among home-based e-workers (for whom it buffers the adverse impact of work intensification). In summary, this study does not confirm the existence of an autonomy paradox associated with remote e-work. Contrarily, it suggests that such a paradox is more likely to surface when research relies on conceptual frameworks that ambiguously define autonomy in terms of what should be more properly conceptualized as discretion.
机译：本文调查了不同方式的空间灵活模式以及自主权和自由裁量权的区别，以找到所谓的自治悖论的合理解释，这维护了远程电子工人的工作自主权越多他们在与工作有关的压力产生不利影响的努力。使用多元回归，我们测试关于自主权，自由裁量权和工作强化的直接影响的假设以及他们在1.380家庭基于家庭工作人员的两次职业压力和2.574移动效应中的职业压力的互动影响。民意调查。主要结果如下。基于家庭的电子工人认为自主权（即，在工作目标上）直接降低职业压力和缓冲工作强化（即自主权对工作目标以及其部门/公司的组织选择）。在远程电子工作的背景下，当工作是移动时，酌情更有​​可能提高工作强化的压力影响。与此同时，我们没有发现自主权增加工作强化，既不是移动电子工人，也不是国内的电子工人，也不是因为它缓冲了工作强化的不利影响）。总之，本研究并未确认存在与远程电子工作相关的自治悖论。相反，它表明，当研究依赖于应该更适当地概念化的概念框架依赖于概念化的概念框架时，这种悖论更有可能表面依赖于自由裁量权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号