...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health perspectives. >Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study
【24h】

Measuring the Success of Community Science: The Northern California Household Exposure Study

机译:衡量社区科学成功:北加州家用曝光研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of these partnerships are to inform and empower better decisions about exposures, foster trust, and generate scientific knowledge to reduce environmental health disparities in low-income, minority communities. Peer-reviewed publication and clinical health outcomes alone are inadequate criteria to judge the success of projects in meeting these goals; therefore, new strategies for evaluating success are needed. Objectives: We reviewed the methods used to evaluate our project, “Linking Breast Cancer Advocacy and Environmental Justice,” to help identify successful CBPR methods and to assist other teams in documenting effectiveness. Although our project precedes the development of the NIEHS Evaluation Metrics Manual, a schema to evaluate the success of projects funded through the Partnerships in Environmental Public Health (PEPH), our work reported here illustrates the record keeping and self-reflection anticipated in NIEHS’s PEPH. Discussion: Evaluation strategies should assess how CBPR partnerships meet the goals of all partners. Our partnership, which included two strong community-based organizations, produced a team that helped all partners gain organizational capacity. Environmental sampling in homes and reporting the results of that effort had community education and constituency-building benefits. Scientific results contributed to a court decision that required cumulative impact assessment for an oil refinery and to new policies for chemicals used in consumer products. All partners leveraged additional funding to extend their work. Conclusions: An appropriate evaluation strategy can demonstrate how CBPR projects can advance science, support community empowerment, increase environmental health literacy, and generate individual and policy action to protect health.
机译:背景:涉及社区参与的环境卫生研究大幅增加,自国家环境卫生科学研究所(NIEHS)环境司法和社区的参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系开始于20世纪90年代中期。这些伙伴关系的目标是提供关于暴露,培养信任的更好决策,并产生科学知识,以减少低收入,少数民族社区的环境健康差异。单独的同行评审的出版物和临床保健结果是判断项目在满足这些目标时的成功的标准不足;因此,需要评估成功的新策略。目标:我们审查了用于评估我们项目的方法,“将乳腺癌宣传和环境司法联系起来”,以帮助确定成功的CBPR方法,并协助其他团队进行记录效果。虽然我们的项目在NIEHS评估指标的发展之前,我们在此报告的是通过环境公共卫生(PEPH)的伙伴关系提供资金的项目,以说明Niehs的Peph预期的记录保存和自我反思。讨论:评估策略应评估CBPR伙伴关系如何满足所有合作伙伴的目标。我们的伙伴关系包括两个强大的社区组织,制作了一个帮助所有合作伙伴获得组织能力的团队。家庭中的环境抽样和报告该努力的结果具有社区教育和选区建设福利。科学成绩促成了法院决定,即储蓄炼油厂的累积影响评估以及消费产品中使用的化学品的新政策。所有合作伙伴都利用额外的资金来延长他们的工作。结论:适当的评估策略可以展示CBPR项目如何推进科学,支持社区赋权,增加环境健康识字,并产生个人和政策行动以保护健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号