...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Qualitative Nursing Research >How Community Nurses Manage Ethical Conflicts: A Grounded Theory Study
【24h】

How Community Nurses Manage Ethical Conflicts: A Grounded Theory Study

机译:社区护士如何管理道德冲突:一个接地的理论研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Research is limited on how nurses in community settings manage ethical conflicts. To address this gap, we conducted a study to uncover the process of behaviors enacted by community nurses when experiencing ethical conflicts. Guided by Glaserian grounded theory, we developed a theoretical model (Moral Compassing) that enables us to explain the process how 24 community nurses managed challenging ethical situations. We discovered that the main concern with which nurses wrestle is moral uncertainty (“Should I be addressing what I think is a moral problem?”). Moral Compassing comprises processes that resolve this main concern by providing community nurses with the means to attain the moral agency necessary to decide to act or to decide not to act. The processes are undergoing a visceral reaction, self-talk, seeking validation, and mobilizing support for action or inaction. We also discovered that community nurses may experience continuing distress that we labeled moral residue.
机译:关于社区环境如何管理道德冲突的研究有限。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项研究,在经历道德冲突时发现社区护士颁布的行为过程。由Glaserian接地理论为指导,我们开发了一种理论模型(道德圆团),使我们能够解释24个社区护士在挑战道德情况下如何实现这一过程。我们发现,护士搏斗的主要关注点是道德不确定性(“我应该解决我认为是道德问题的事吗?”)。道德队员包括解决这一主要关切的过程,通过为社区护士提供达到决定行动所必需的道德机构或决定不采取行动的手段。该过程正在进行内脏反应,自我谈话,寻求验证和动员支持行动或不作为。我们还发现,社区护士可能会经历持续的困扰,以至于我们标记了道德残留物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号