首页> 外文期刊>Molecular cytogenetics >Prenatal diagnosis of 4953 pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis in Northeast China
【24h】

Prenatal diagnosis of 4953 pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis in Northeast China

机译:4953孕妇对东北遗传羊膜穿刺症患者的产前诊断

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Several different technologies are used for prenatal screening procedures and genetic diagnostic technologies. We aimed to investigate the rates of chromosomal abnormalities in cases with different abnormal prenatal indications and to determine the relationships between fetal chromosomal abnormalities and indicators of prenatal abnormalities in Northeast China.Methods:We evaluated 4953 16- to 23-week singleton gestation cases using amniocentesis and a total of 3583 participants received serological screening. Fetal chromosomal analyses were performed for all samples using fluorescence in situ hybridization and karyotyping.Results:Among these samples, 204 (4.12%) had fetal chromosomal abnormalities. A total of 3583 participants received serological screening, among whom 102 (2.85%) exhibited positive results. A total of 309 participants had ultrasonography; 42 (13.6%) of these had abnormalities. Among 97 participants who had non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), 59 (61%) had positive results. Among 1265 participants with advanced maternal age, 78 (6.2%) had abnormal results.Conclusion:The serological screening and NIPT that were included in the prenatal screening methods all had false positive and false negative rates. Although they are both prenatal screening techniques, maternal serum screening cannot be replaced by NIPT. The pregnancy women should accept NIPT in a qualified prenatal diagnostic center. We recommend that pregnant women at high or critical risk undergoing prenatal screening should confirm the fetal karyotype through amniocentesis. Moreover, if women receive a positive result via NIPT, they should not have a pregnancy termination without undergoing further prenatal diagnosis.? The Author(s). 2019.
机译:背景:几种不同的技术用于产前筛查程序和遗传诊断技术。我们旨在调查不同异常产前指示的病例中的染色体异常的速率,并确定东北地区胎儿染色体异常与产前异常指标的关系。方法:使用羊膜穿刺术评估4953 16至23周的单身妊娠病例共有3583名参与者接受了血清学筛查。对所有样品进行胎儿染色体分析,用于使用荧光原位杂交和核型分析。结果:在这些样品中,204(4.12%)具有胎儿染色体异常。共有3583名参与者接受血清学筛查,其中102(2.85%)表现出积极的结果。共有309名参与者具有超声检查; 42(13.6%)这些具有异常。在具有非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)的97名参与者中,59名(61%)有积极的结果。在1265名患有先进的孕产妇年龄的参与者中,78名(6.2%)出现异常结果。结论:包含在产前筛查方法中的血清学筛查和NIPT都具有假阳性和假负率。虽然它们都是产前筛查技术,但母体血清筛选不能用nipt取代。妊娠妇女应接受合格产前诊断中心的NIPT。我们建议经历产前筛查的高或临界风险的孕妇应通过羊膜膜确认胎儿核型。此外,如果女性通过NIPT接受阳性结果,则不应妊娠期终止而不经历进一步的产前诊断。作者。 2019年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号