Does Environmental Regulation Promote Green Technology Innovation in Chinese Manufacturing?

Jingjing Liu; Ming Zhao

首页> 外文期刊>Open Access Library Journal >Does Environmental Regulation Promote Green Technology Innovation in Chinese Manufacturing?

【24h】

Does Environmental Regulation Promote Green Technology Innovation in Chinese Manufacturing?

机译：环境监管是否促进了中国制造业的绿色技术创新？

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The Porter Hypothesis states that environmental regulation promotes technological innovation among enterprises, thereby supporting economic growth. However, whether the hypothesis is valid in China remains to be tested. To assess this, we construct an environmental regulation panel model to assess the impact of regulation on green technology innovation, examining data from 27 manufacturing industries in China from 2006 to 2015. Based on extant research results on environmental regulation and technological innovation in China and abroad, we divide green technology innovation into green product innovation and green process innovation as the dependent variables, using environmental regulation as the independent variable and total industry profits and innovative human resources as the control variables. Our results show that at this stage, for the 27 industries, the implementation of strict environmental regulations has inhibited both green process innovation and green product innovation. The result verifies that the Porter Hypothesis is not valid in the current Chinese manufacturing environment.

机译：搬运工假设指出，环境监管促进企业之间的技术创新，从而支持经济增长。但是，假设是否有效在中国仍有待测试。为了评估这一点，建立一个环境监管小组模型，以评估规定对绿色技术创新的影响，从2006年到2015年检查中国27个制造业的数据。基于现存研究结果中国和国外的环境监管技术创新，我们将绿色技术创新分为绿色产品创新和绿色进程创新作为依赖变量，利用环境监管作为独立变量和全行业利润和创新人力资源作为控制变量。我们的研究结果表明，在这一阶段，对于27个行业来说，严格的环境法规的实施抑制了绿色流程创新和绿色产品创新。结果验证了波特假设在当前的中国制造环境中无效。

著录项

来源
《Open Access Library Journal》 |2020年第7期|共16页
作者
Jingjing Liu; Ming Zhao;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
Environmental RegulationGreen Technology InnovationGreen Product InnovationGreen Process Innovation;

机译：环境规范技术创新创新产品创新流程创新;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies [J] . Xiang Cai, Bangzhu Zhu, Haijing Zhang, The Science of the Total Environment . 2020,第Deca1期

机译：直接环境监管促进污染工业的绿色技术创新吗？来自中国上市公司的证据
2. Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities [J] . Du Kerui, Cheng Yuanyuan, Yao Xin Energy economics . 2021,第Juna期

机译：环境监管，绿色技术创新和产业结构升级：中国城市绿色转型之路
3. Environmental regulation, green innovation, and international competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises in China: From the perspective of heterogeneous regulatory tools [J] . Yuanhong Hu, Sheng Sun, Yixin Dai PLoS One . 2021,第3期

机译：中国生产企业的环境监管，绿色创新和国际竞争力：从异质监管工具的角度来看
4. Environmental Regulation and Technology Innovation: Evidence from China [C] . Lin Minghua, Yang Yongzhong International Conference on Energy, Environment and Development . 2013

机译：环境监管和技术创新：来自中国的证据
5. Technology development in Ontario's environmental technology industry: Towards a model of the environmental regulation-innovation relationship. [D] . Dupuy, Damian Anthony. 1999

机译：安大略省环境技术行业的技术发展：建立环境法规与创新关系的模型。
6. Environmental regulation green innovation and international competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises in China: From the perspective of heterogeneous regulatory tools [O] . Yuanhong Hu, Sheng Sun, Yixin Dai 2021

机译：中国制造企业的环境监管绿色创新和国际竞争力：从异质监管工具的角度来看
7. Competing Recombinant Technologies for Environmental Innovation: Extending Arthur’s Model of Lock-in Abstract: This article presents a model of sequential decisions about investments in environmentally dirty and clean technologies, which extends the path-dependence framework of Arthur (1989). This allows us to evaluate if and how an economy locked into a dirty technology can be unlocked and move towards the clean technology. The main extension involves the inclusion of the effect of recombinant innovation of the two technologies. A mechanism of endogenous competition is described involving a positive externality of increasing returns to investment which are counterbalanced by recombinant innovation. We determine conditions under which lock-in can be avoided or escaped. A second extension is â€œsymmetry breakingâ€ of the system due to the introduction of an environmental policy that charges a price for polluting. A final extension adds a cost of environmental policy in the form of lower returns on investment implemented through a growth-depressing factor. We compare cumulative pollution under different scenarios, so that we can evaluate the combination of environmental regulation and recombinant innovation. [O] . Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Zeppini Rossi P. 100

机译：用于环境创新的竞争重组技术：扩展亚瑟的锁定模型摘要：本文介绍了关于环境污染和清洁技术投资的连续决策模型，该模型扩展了亚瑟（1989）的路径依赖框架。这使我们能够评估是否以及如何解锁陷入肮脏技术的经济并转向清洁技术。主要的扩展涉及包括两种技术的重组创新的效果。内生竞争的机制被描述为涉及通过重组创新抵消的增加投资回报的正外部性。我们确定可以避免或转义锁定的条件。由于引入了污染价格的环境政策，第二个延伸是系统的“对称性破坏”。最后的延期增加了环境政策的成本，通过增长抑制因素实现了较低的投资回报。我们比较了不同情景下的累积污染，从而可以评估环境调控与重组创新的结合。

Does Environmental Regulation Promote Green Technology Innovation in Chinese Manufacturing?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅