...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Adult Perceptions of Different Orthodontic Appliances
【24h】

Adult Perceptions of Different Orthodontic Appliances

机译:成人对不同正畸家电的看法

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Pursuing an esthetically-pleasing orthodontic outcome, orthodontic patients must consider and choose from the different available options of orthodontic appliance. Practitioners need to be better informed of their customers’ preferences to make better practice management decisions and satisfy their patients’ needs. Purpose: To explore adult laypeople’s perceptions of the attractiveness, acceptability, preference and economic value of different orthodontic appliances when they consider these appliances for themselves and for their children. Patients and methods: This cross-sectional survey included 199 adults (110 females). The average age of participants was 27.7 years. Participants answered a questionnaire evaluating and comparing multiple smiling images of an adult wearing different orthodontic appliances. Participants rated each appliance for: (1) attractiveness on a Likert scale; (2) acceptability of having the appliance placed for themselves and their children (with a yes/no response); (3) preference (by ranking all appliances in order); and (4) economic value (by providing the additional amount they are willing to pay for each appliance for themselves and their children). Results: We found a statistically significant difference in the attractiveness scores between the different orthodontic appliances (p 0.0001). The most attractive appliances were clear aligners and lingual brackets. The least attractive appliances were colored o-tied-brackets followed by shaped-brackets. Clear aligners were the most acceptable appliances among our participants to have placed on themselves (86.9%) and their children (84.9%). Shaped brackets were the least acceptable appliances among our participants to have placed on themselves (24.1%) and their children (36.2%). The most preferred appliances were lingual brackets (39.2%), followed by clear aligners (34.17%). The least preferred appliances were colored o-tied-brackets (4%). Participants varied with regards to how much more they were willing to pay for each of the different orthodontic appliances. The majority were willing to pay more for clear aligners and lingual brackets to have them placed on themselves but not to have them placed on their children. Conclusion: Adults preferred more innovative esthetic appliances over traditional ones and were willing to pay more to have them placed on themselves but not on their children.
机译:简介:追求美学令人愉悦的正畸结果,正畸患者必须考虑并从正畸器具的不同选择选项中进行选择。从业者需要更好地了解客户的偏好,以便更好的实践管理决策并满足患者的需求。目的:探讨成人的Laypeople在考虑这些家用电器的吸引力,可接受性,偏好和经济价值的看法,当他们为自己和孩子们考虑这些家用电器时。患者和方法:这种横断面调查包括199个成年人(110名女性)。参与者的平均年龄是277年。参与者回答了一个调查问卷评估和比较穿着不同的正畸家用电器的成年人的多个微笑图像。参与者评分各自的家用电器:(1)李克特规模的吸引力; (2)让自己和儿童放置的设备的可接受性(有是/禁令); (3)偏好(按顺序排列所有电器); (4)经济价值(通过提供额外的金额,他们愿意为自己及其子女支付每家电支付)。结果:我们发现不同正畸电器之间的吸引力分数有统计学意义(P <0.0001)。最具吸引力的家用电器是清晰的对齐器和舌括号。最少有吸引力的家电是彩色的O形捆 - 支架,然后是形状括号。清晰的对齐器是我们参与者中最可接受的家电(86.9%)及其子女(84.9%)。塑造括号是我们参与者中最不可接受的家电(24.1%)及其子女(36.2%)。最优选的设备是舌括号(39.2%),其次是透明对准器(34.17%)。最不优选的设备是有色O形捆 - 括号(4%)。参与者对他们愿意为每种不同的正畸家电支付多少差异。大多数人愿意为明确的对齐器和舌括号支付更多,以使他们自己放置,而不是让他们放在孩子身上。结论:成年人更喜欢传统的更具创新性的美学家电,并愿意支付更多,让他们自己放置,但不对他们的孩子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号