...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of Tehran Heart Center. >A Systematic Review of the Instruments Used for Evaluating Causal Beliefs and Perceived Heart Risk Factors
【24h】

A Systematic Review of the Instruments Used for Evaluating Causal Beliefs and Perceived Heart Risk Factors

机译：对用于评估因果信念和感知心脏风险因素的仪器的系统审查

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: The etiologies and causal beliefs of heart disease are considered one of the 5 dimensions of health self-regulatory model. Thus, the present study aimed to review the literature and screen the appropriate tools for evaluating the causal beliefs and perceived heart risk factors (PHRFs).Methods: The review samples encompassed all published articles from 1992 to March 2017. A systematic search was conducted across 6 databases: the Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, EBSCO, ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. The qualitative evaluation of the articles was examined using the checklists of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) by 2 independent investigators. After the application of the criteria for inclusion in the study, 22 studies were obtained according to the PRISMA guidelines.Results: A total of 10 504 (50.5% male) patients at an average age of 57.85±10.75 years participated in 22 studies under review. The results of the systematic review showed that 22 tools were available to measure PHRFs. The instruments were categorized into 4 groups of valid scales (6 studies), invalid questionnaires (6 studies), checklists (3 studies), and open-ended single items (7 studies). Only 23.2% of the measuring instruments were sufficiently valid.Conclusion: The results of this systematic review showed that a limited number of valid tools were available to measure PHRFs. Considering the importance of studying cardiac patients’ perception of the etiology of disease and the paucity of standards and valid grading scales, it seems necessary to design and provide tools with broader content that can cover all aspects of patients’ beliefs.
机译：背景：心脏病的病因和因果关系被认为是卫生自我监管模型的5维度之一。因此，本研究旨在审查文献和筛选用于评估因果关系和感知心脏风险因素（PHRFS）的适当工具。方法：审查样本包括从1992年到2017年3月的所有已发表的文章。在2017年至2017年3月。进行了系统搜索6数据库：科学，SCOPUS，MEDLINE，EBSCO，PROQUEST，PSYCINFO和Google Scholar网络。使用批判性评估技能计划（CASP）的清单进行了两次独立调查人员的定性评估。在纳入研究标准后，根据PRISMA指南获得22项研究。结果：共有10名504名（50.5％的男性）患者，平均年龄为57.85±10.75岁，参加了22项正在进行的研究。系统审查结果表明，22项工具可用于测量PHRFS。将该仪器分为4组有效尺度（6项研究），无效的问卷（6项研究），清单（3项研究）和开放式单项（7项研究）。只有23.2％的测量仪器足够有效。结论：该系统审查的结果表明，有限数量的有效工具可用于测量PHRFS。考虑到研究心脏病患者对疾病病因的看法和标准的缺乏和有效分级秤的重要性，它似乎有必要设计和提供具有更广泛内容的工具，可以涵盖患者信仰的所有方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号