...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences >Assessment of Aluminum Chloride Retraction Cords, Expasyl, and Tetrahydrozoline-Soaked Retraction Systems in Gingival Retraction
【24h】

Assessment of Aluminum Chloride Retraction Cords, Expasyl, and Tetrahydrozoline-Soaked Retraction Systems in Gingival Retraction

机译：粘合缩回中的氯化铝缩回帘线，expasyl和四羟基喹啉 - 浸入式收缩系统的评估

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess different gingival displacement systems such as aluminum chloride retraction cords, expasyl, and tetrahydrozoline-soaked retraction cord to record intracrevicular margins of tooth preparations.Materials and Methods:This study included 60 patients. Patients were divided into four groups of 15 each. In group I, aluminum chloride retraction cords, in group II expasyl, in group III tetrahydrozoline-soaked retraction cord, and in group IV no retraction cord were used.Results:The mean gingival displacement (μm) in group I was 825.6, in group II was 482.1, in group III was 742.3, and in group IV was 214.8. Significant difference was seen in between groups by one-way analysis of variance as P < 0.05. Post hoc Tukey analysis showed significant difference during multiple comparison between groups.Conclusion:Authors found that maximum gingival retraction was achieved with aluminum chloride retraction cords followed by tetrahydrozoline and expasyl.
机译：本研究的目的是评估氯化铝缩回帘线，expasyl和四羟基喹啉浸出的缩回绳等不同的牙龈位移系统，以记录牙齿制剂的血管制剂。材料和方法：本研究包括60名患者。患者分为每组15组。在I组中，III族四羟基喹啉 - 浸湿缩回绳的氯化铝缩回帘线，II族四羟基喹啉 - 浸渍绳索，并且在IV组中没有收缩帘线。结果：I族的平均牙龈位移（μm）为825.6，组II是482.1，III组为742.3，IV组为214.8。通过单向分析差异为P <0.05，在组之间看到显着差异。后HOC Tukey分析在组之间的多重比较期间显示出显着差异。结论：作者发现，用氯化铝收缩绳索，然后用四氢唑啉和excasyl来实现最大牙龈缩回。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号