首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of STEM Education >Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review
【24h】

Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review

机译:援助实施积极学习的教师策略:系统文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Despite the evidence supporting the effectiveness of active learning in undergraduate STEM courses, the adoption of active learning has been slow. One barrier to adoption is instructors’ concerns about students’ affective and behavioral responses to active learning, especially student resistance. Numerous education researchers have documented their use of active learning in STEM classrooms. However, there is no research yet that systematically analyzes these studies for strategies to aid implementation of active learning and address students’ affective and behavioral responses. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review and identify 29 journal articles and conference papers that researched active learning, affective and behavioral student responses, and recommended at least one strategy for implementing active learning. In this paper, we ask: (1) What are the characteristics of studies that examine affective and behavioral outcomes of active learning and provide instructor strategies? (2) What instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning do the authors of these studies provide? Results In our review, we noted that most active learning activities involved in-class problem solving within a traditional lecture-based course ( N = 21). We found mostly positive affective and behavioral outcomes for students’ self-reports of learning, participation in the activities, and course satisfaction ( N = 23). From our analysis of the 29 studies, we identified eight strategies to aid implementation of active learning based on three categories. Explanation strategies included providing students with clarifications and reasons for using active learning. Facilitation strategies entailed working with students and ensuring that the activity functions as intended. Planning strategies involved working outside of the class to improve the active learning experience. Conclusion To increase the adoption of active learning and address students’ responses to active learning, this study provides strategies to support instructors. The eight strategies are listed with evidence from numerous studies within our review on affective and behavioral responses to active learning. Future work should examine instructor strategies and their connection with other affective outcomes, such as identity, interests, and emotions.
机译:背景,尽管证据支持本科生干课程中积极学习的有效性,但采用积极学习一直缓慢。采用的一个障碍是教练对学生对主动学习的情感和行为反应的担忧,特别是学生抵抗。许多教育研究人员凭借在Stew教室中使用积极学习。然而,没有研究,系统地分析了这些研究以帮助实施积极学习和解决学生情感和行为反应的战略。在本文中,我们进行了系统的文献综述,并确定了第29条期刊文章和会议论文,这些论文研究了主动学习,情感和行为学生的反应,并建议至少一个实施积极学习的战略。在本文中,我们问:(1)研究积极学习的情感和行为结果以及提供教师策略的研究的特点是什么? (2)这些研究的作者提供了援助积极学习的援助执行的教师策略吗?结果我们的审核,我们指出,最具活跃的学习活动涉及在传统的基于讲座的课程内解决的课堂问题(n = 21)。我们发现学生的自我报告,参与活动以及课程满意度的积极情感和行为结果(n = 23)。从我们对29项研究的分析来看,我们确定了八个策略,以帮助基于三个类别实施积极学习。解释策略包括为学生提供澄清和使用主动学习的原因。促进战略需要与学生合作,并确保活动按预期职能。规划策略涉及在课堂外工作,以提高积极的学习体验。结论增加了采用积极学习和解决学生对积极学习的回应,本研究提供支持教师的策略。八种策略列出了许多研究中的证据,以我们对积极学习的情感和行为反应的审查中。未来的工作应该审查教师战略及其与其他情感结果的联系,例如身份,兴趣和情感。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号