• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Does It Matter What I Say? Using Language to Examine Reactions to Ostracism as It Occurs
【24h】

Does It Matter What I Say? Using Language to Examine Reactions to Ostracism as It Occurs

机译：我说的是很重要吗？使用语言来检查其发生时的反应

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Most of our knowledge about how social exclusion affects those who ostracize and those who are being ostracized is based on questionnaires administered after the ostracism situation is over. In this research, we strive to further our understanding of the internal dynamics of an ostracism situation. We therefore examine individuals’ language—more specifically, function words—as a behavior indicative of psychological processes and emergent states that can be unobtrusively recorded right in the situation. In online chats, 128 participants talked about a personal topic in groups of three. In the experimental group (n = 79), two conversation partners ignored every contribution by the third. We found that, compared to the control group, these targets of ostracism used language indicative of a self-focus and worsened mood, but not of social focus or positivity, although positivity was related to a writer’s likeability. Sources of ostracism use language suggesting that they are distancing themselves from the situation, and they further engaged in victim derogation. We discuss how our results highlight the severity and potential self-sustainability of ostracism.
机译：大多数人关于社会排除如何影响世界卫生组织的人以及正在排斥的人的知识是基于排斥性能结束后管理的问卷基础。在这项研究中，我们努力进一步了解撤销局势的内部动态。因此，我们研究了个人的语言 - 更具体地，功能词 - 作为表明心理过程和新兴国家的行为，这些行为可以在情况下不可或缺的录制。在线聊天中，128名参与者在三组中讨论了一个个人主题。在实验组（n = 79）中，两个谈话合作伙伴忽略了第三个贡献。我们发现，与对照组相比，这些次追逐主义的目标使用语言指示自我对焦和情绪恶化，但不具有社会焦点或积极性，尽管阳性与作者的可爱性有关。疏散主义的来源使用语言表明他们正在远离这种情况，他们进一步从事受害者减少。我们讨论了我们的结果突出了排斥性的严重性和潜在的自我可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号