...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Informatics in Medicine Unlocked >A comparative study of strategies for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in Gulf Cooperation Council countries and the European Union
【24h】

A comparative study of strategies for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in Gulf Cooperation Council countries and the European Union

机译：遏制海湾合作委员会及欧盟Covid-19大流行的策略的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has impacted every aspect of human lives including health, businesses, and lifestyles. In spite of governments implementing various strategies across the globe, the pandemic is still expanding with increasing numbers of positive cases. In addition, countries are reopening and easing lockdown restrictions in order to get their economies back on track, and this has led to an increase in the transmission of novel coronavirus. Therefore, it is essential to regularly review the containment strategies employed in different regions in order to understand the characteristics of COVID-19 transmission and to formulate a future course of actions.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to review the COVID-19 transmission statistics in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and European Union (EU) countries, and to compare these data with the various containment strategies implemented for containing the spread of the virus.MethodsA review method was adopted along with different statistical methods for comparing and analyzing COVID-19 data and containment strategies. Transmission types and the Case Fatality Rate (CFR) in the countries in both regions are used to present the current state of the pandemic. In addition, changes in the number of COVID-19 cases are compared with the mitigation and suppression strategies implemented in both regions and their impact is analyzed.ResultsCountries in the EU were slow in reacting to the pandemic, as delays are observed in the implementation of mitigation strategies. However, suppression strategies were implemented soon after mitigation strategies. GCC countries, on the other hand, were quick to react, and they implemented both mitigation and suppression strategies simultaneously, as soon as the pandemic emerged. The CFR was found to be low among GCC countries compared to EU countries. In addition, a second wave of transmission was observed in the EU, whereas in GCC countries there has been no second wave, although a gradual increase in the number of cases is observed. Community transmission was observed among the majority of countries in both GCC and EU countries.ConclusionsWith the reopening of markets, the focus of governments should be on developing integrated user-centric preventive strategies, with a blend of awareness creation, motivation, and support.
机译：背景技术Covid-19大流行影响了人类生活的各个方面，包括健康，企业和生活方式。尽管各国政府在全球实施各种战略，但大流行仍然随着越来越多的积极病例而扩大。此外，各国正在重新开放和缓解锁定限制，以便将其经济转回轨道，这导致了新型冠状病毒的传播增加。因此，必须定期审查不同地区所采用的遏制策略，以了解Covid-19传播的特点，并制定未来的行动课程。本研究的目的是审查Covid-19传输统计数据海湾合作委员会（GCC）和欧洲联盟（欧盟）国家，并将这些数据与用于含有病毒传播所实施的各种遏制策略进行比较。方法采用了不同的统计方法，用于比较和分析Covid-19数据和遏制策略。两个地区各国中的传输类型和病例（CFR）用于呈现大流行的当前状态。此外，与两种地区实施的缓解和抑制策略进行了比较了Covid-19案件数量的变化，并分析了它们的影响。欧盟的疗程对大流行的反应缓慢，因为在实施中遵守延误缓解策略。但是，缓解战略后立即实施了抑制策略。另一方面，GCC国家迅速做出反应，并在流行出现的情况下立即同时实施缓解和抑制策略。与欧盟国家相比，CFR在GCC国家中被发现低。此外，在欧盟观察到第二波传输，而在GCC国家中，没有第二波，尽管观察到病例数量的逐渐增加。在GCC和欧盟国家的大多数国家观察到社区传播。结论市场重新开放，政府的重点应该是制定综合用户为中心的预防策略，具有意识创造，动机和支持的融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号