...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research Integrity and Peer Review >Strengthening the incentives for responsible research practices in Australian health and medical research funding
【24h】

Strengthening the incentives for responsible research practices in Australian health and medical research funding

机译：加强澳大利亚健康和医学研究资金负责任研究实践的激励措施

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BackgroundAustralian health and medical research funders support substantial research efforts, and incentives within grant funding schemes influence researcher behaviour. We aimed to determine to what extent Australian health and medical funders incentivise responsible research practices.MethodsWe conducted an audit of instructions from research grant and fellowship schemes. Eight national research grants and fellowships were purposively sampled to select schemes that awarded the largest amount of funds. The funding scheme instructions were assessed against 9 criteria to determine to what extent they incentivised these responsible research and reporting practices: (1) publicly register study protocols before starting data collection, (2) register analysis protocols before starting data analysis, (3) make study data openly available, (4) make analysis code openly available, (5) make research materials openly available, (6) discourage use of publication metrics, (7) conduct quality research (e.g. adhere to reporting guidelines), (8) collaborate with a statistician, and (9) adhere to other responsible research practices. Each criterion was answered using one of the following responses: “Instructed”, “Encouraged”, or “No mention”.ResultsAcross the 8 schemes from 5 funders, applicants were instructed or encouraged to address a median of 4 (range 0 to 5) of the 9 criteria. Three criteria received no mention in any scheme (register analysis protocols, make analysis code open, collaborate with a statistician). Importantly, most incentives did not seem strong as applicants were only instructed to register study protocols, discourage use of publication metrics and conduct quality research. Other criteria were encouraged but were not required.ConclusionsFunders could strengthen the incentives for responsible research practices by requiring grant and fellowship applicants to implement these practices in their proposals. Administering institutions could be required to implement these practices to be eligible for funding. Strongly rewarding researchers for implementing robust research practices could lead to sustained improvements in the quality of health and medical research.
机译：背景技术健康和医学研究资助者支持大量的研究努力，并在授予资助计划中的激励措施影响研究员行为。我们旨在确定澳大利亚卫生和医疗资助者在多大程度上激励负责任的研究实践.Thodswe对研究赠款和团契计划进行了审计。八个国家研究拨款和奖学金被派分自动取样，以选择授予最大资金量的计划。评估资金计划指示，以确定9标准，以确定他们在多大程度上激励了这些负责任的研究和报告实践：（1）公开注册在开始数据收集之前的学习协议，（2）在开始数据分析之前注册分析协议，（3）研究数据公开可用，（4）进行公开可用的分析码，（5）使研究材料公开使用，（6）劝阻出版指标的使用，（7）进行质量研究（例如，遵守报告指南），（8）合作与统计学家和（9）坚持其他负责任的研究实践。每个标准都是使用以下答复之一回答：“指示”，“鼓励”，或“没有提及”。资料来自5个资助者的8个计划，申请人被指示或鼓励地址为4（范围0至5） 9标准。在任何方案中没有提及三个标准（寄存器分析协议，使分析代码打开，与统计学家合作）。重要的是，大多数激励措施似乎并不强劲，因为申请人只指示注册学习协议，劝阻出版指标并进行质量研究。鼓励其他标准，但不需要.ConclusionsFunders通过要求赠款和团契申请人在提案中落实这些做法，可以加强对负责任的研究实践的激励措施。可能需要管理机构履行这些做法，以符合资金资格。强烈奖励实施强劲研究实践的研究人员可能导致健康和医学质量的持续改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号