首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Biomechanical Comparison of Panda Rope Bridge Technique and Other Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair Techniques In Vitro
【24h】

Biomechanical Comparison of Panda Rope Bridge Technique and Other Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair Techniques In Vitro

机译:熊猫绳桥技术的生物力学比较及其他微创阿基里斯肌腱修复技术体外

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Although nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a reasonable option, surgical repair has attracted attention for young and active patients. More reliable Achilles tendon repair techniques are needed to enhance recovery after ATR in this population. Purpose/Hypothesis: To biomechanically analyze the panda rope bridge technique (PRBT) and compare it with other minimally invasive repair techniques over a simulated, progressive rehabilitation program. It was hypothesized that PRBT would result in better biomechanical properties and enhanced recovery after ATR. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: An Achilles tendon rupture was created 4 cm from the distal tendon insertion site in 40 bovine lower extremities, and specimens were then randomly allocated to 5 Achilles tendon repair techniques: (1) Achillon, (2) modified Achillon, (3) Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS), (4) modified PARS, and (5) PRBT. Each group was subjected to a cyclic loading protocol that was representative of progressive postoperative rehabilitation for ATR (250 cycles at 1 Hz for each loading stage: 20-100 N, 20-200 N, 20-300 N, and 20-400 N). Results: The PRBT technique demonstrated significantly less elongation (1.62 ± 0.25 mm) than the 4 other repair techniques after the first loading stage of 20 to 100 N ( P & .05). All specimens in the 4 other groups developed a large gap (elongation ≥5 mm) at the 20- to 200-N loading stage. When overall biomechanical performance was examined, the PRBT group exhibited higher strength (20-400 N) and more mean loading cycles (984 ± 10) compared with the 4 other groups ( P & .05). Conclusion: In this bovine model, PRBT biomechanically outperformed the other minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair techniques that were tested and could therefore meet the requirements of accelerated rehabilitation. Clinical Relevance: The reduced tendency for premature rerupture and the overall improved biomechanical properties of PRBT suggest that ATR patients treated with PRBT may more readily complete early and aggressive postoperative rehabilitation protocols. In addition, they may have a lower risk of early irreversible suture failure.
机译:背景:虽然急性阿基里斯肌腱破裂(ATR)是一种合理的选择,手术修复引起了年轻和活跃患者的关注。需要更可靠的Achilles肌腱修复技术,以提高该人群ATR后的恢复。目的/假设:生物力学分析熊猫绳桥技术(PARBT),并将其与模拟,渐进式康复计划的其他微创修复技术进行比较。假设PRBT将导致更好的生物力学性质和ATR后提高恢复。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:从40牛下肢的远端肌腱插入位点产生achilles肌腱破裂4厘米,然后随机分配标本为5个Achilles肌腱修复技术:(1)achillon,(2)修饰的achillon,(3)经皮Achilles修复系统(PARS),(4)修改分析,(5)公共。对每组的循环加载方案进行循环加载方案,其代表ATR的逐步术后康复(每次加载阶段为250次循环:20-100n,20-200n,20-300n和20-400n) 。结果:PRBT技术的伸长率显着较低(1.62±0.25毫米),比第一个装载阶段为20-100 n(P& .05)后的4个其他修复技术。 4个其他组中的所有标本在20至200升加载阶段在20至200升的距离发生了大的间隙(伸长率≥5mm)。当检查整体生物力学性能时,与4个其他基团(P& 05)相比,PRBT组出现了更高的强度(20-400n)和更平均的装载循环(984±10)。结论:在这个牛模型中,PRBT生物力学优于测试的其他最小侵入性的肌腱修复技术,因此可以满足加速康复的要求。临床相关性:严重破裂趋势和公共的整体改善的生物力学特性表明,受灾评估的ATR患者可能更容易完成早期和侵略性的术后康复方案。此外,它们可能具有较低的早期不可逆缝合缝合失效的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号