首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Well-Being in Life and Well-Being at Work: Which Comes First? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study
【24h】

Well-Being in Life and Well-Being at Work: Which Comes First? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study

机译:在生活中幸福和工作幸福:第一个来了吗? 来自纵向研究的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Understanding reciprocal relationships between specific arenas in life and at work is critical for designing interventions to improve workplace health and safety. Most studies about the links between dimensions of well-being in life and at work have been cross-sectional and usually narrowly focused on one of the dimensions of the work-life well-being link. The issues of causality and feedback between life and work well-being have often not been addressed. We overcome these issues by measuring six aspects of well-being for both the work arena and life in general, using longitudinal data with a clear temporal sequence of cause and effect, and by explicitly accounting for feedback with potential effects in both directions. Nine hundred and fifty-four Mexican apparel factory workers at a major global brand participated in two waves of the Worker Well-Being Survey. Data on life satisfaction and job satisfaction, happiness and positive affect, meaning and purpose, health, and social relationships in life and at work were used. Lagged regression controlling for confounders and prior outcomes was employed. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the robustness of the results to potential unmeasured confounding. For the relationships between life satisfaction and job satisfaction and between happiness in life and happiness at work effects in both directions were found. Nevertheless, indication of a larger effect of life satisfaction on job satisfaction than the reverse was obtained. For depression and meaning in life, there was evidence for an effect of life well-being on work-related well-being, but not for the reverse. For social relationships and purpose, there was evidence for an effect of work-related well-being on life well-being, but not the reverse. Relationships based on the longitudinal data were considerably weaker than their respective cross-sectional associations. This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of the relationship between aspects of well-being in the arenas of life and work. Findings from this study may facilitate the development of novel workplace programs promoting working conditions that enable lifelong flourishing in life and at work.
机译:了解生活中的特定竞技场和工作之间的互惠关系对于设计干预措施至关重要,以改善工作场所健康和安全。关于福祉维度与工作之间的尺寸之间的联系的大多数研究已经横截面,通常狭窄地聚焦在工作寿命阱链路的尺寸之一上。常常不解决生命与工作之间的因果关系和反馈问题。我们通过衡量工作竞技场和寿命的六个方面来克服这些问题,通常使用明确的时间的原因和效果,并通过明确地占两个方向上的潜在效果的反馈。全球主要品牌的九百和五十四名墨西哥服装工厂工人参加了两波浪的工人幸福的调查。使用生活满意度和工作满意度,幸福和积极影响,幸福和宗旨,健康,健康和社会关系。采用滞后回归对混乱和事先结果进行控制。敏感性分析用于评估结果对潜在未测量混淆的鲁棒性。对于生活满意度和工作满意度之间的关系以及在两个方向上的生活效果中的幸福与幸福之间。然而,获得了比逆转的工作满意度更大的生命满足效果的迹象。对于生活中的抑郁和意义,有证据表明生活福祉与工作有关的福祉,但不是反向。为了社会关系和目的,有证据表明与工作有关的福祉效果福祉,但并非反向。基于纵向数据的关系比其各自的横截面关联相当弱。这项研究有助于了解我们对生命和工作中幸福方面的关系之间的性质。本研究的调查结果可以促进促进工作条件的新型工作场所方案的发展,使得生活终身蓬勃发展和工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号