• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial
【24h】

The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial

机译：针对办公室工作人员的干预措施的自我效能，动机和感知障碍的影响：一组随机控制试验

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The importance of physical activity on health is clear, but changing behaviour is difficult. Successful interventions aiming to improve physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is therefore of importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects on motivation, self-efficacy and barriers to change behaviour from two different behavioural intervention focusing either on reducing sedentary behaviour or on increasing physical activity as compared to a waiting list control group. The study was designed as a cluster randomized control trial (RCT) within two private companies. Self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers were together with demographic variables assessed before and after a 6-month intervention. Participant cluster teams were randomly allocated to either the physical activity intervention (iPA), the sedentary behaviour intervention (iSED), or control group. The intervention was multi componential and included motivational counselling based on Cognitive behaviour therapy and Motivational interviewing, group activities and management involvement. Group differences were determined using Bayesian multilevel modelling (parameter estimate; credible interval (CI)), analysing complete cases and those who adhered to the protocol by adhering to at least 3 out of 5 intervention sessions. After the intervention, the complete cases analysis showed that the iPA group had significantly higher autonomous motivation (0.33, CI: 0.05–0.61) and controlled motivation (0.27, CI: 0.04–0.51) for physical activity compared with the control group. The iSED group scored less autonomous and controlled motivation compared to the iPA group (0.38, CI: ??0.69- -0.087 respectively ??0.32, CI: ??0.57-0.07) but no significant differences compared with the control group. Among individuals that adhered to the protocol, the results showed higher scores on Exercise (3.03, CI: 0.28–6.02) and Sedentary self-efficacy (3.59, CI: 0.35–7.15) for individuals in the iPA group and on Sedentary self-efficacy (4.77, CI: 0.59–9.44) for the iSED group compared to the control group. These findings indicate that the interventions were successful in increasing self-efficacy in each intervention group and autonomous motivation for exercise in the iPA group, in particular when actively participating in the motivational counselling sessions.
机译：身体活动对健康的重要性很清楚，但不断变化的行为是困难的。因此，旨在改善身体活动和减少久坐行为的成功干预措施是重要的。本研究的目的是评估对来自两种不同行为干预的动机，自我效力和障碍的影响，这些行为在与等候名单对照组相比减少久坐行为或增加身体活动时。该研究被设计为两家私营公司内的集群随机控制试验（RCT）。自我效能，动机和感知障碍与在6个月干预之前和之后评估的人口变量。参与者团队随机分配给身体活动干预（IPA），久坐行为干预（ISED）或对照组。干预是多重成分，包括基于认知行为治疗和励志访谈，集团活动和管理参与的动机咨询。使用贝叶斯多级建模确定组差异（参数估计;可靠的间隔（CI）），分析完整的案例和那些遵守5个干预课程中至少3个遵守协议的人。干预后，完全案例分析表明，与对照组相比，IPA组的自主动力（0.33，CI：0.05-0.61）和控制动机（0.27，CI：0.04-0.51）。与IPA组（0.38，CI：0.69--0.087分别相比，受到的群体均得分较少的自主和控制的动机（分别为0.39-0.087 0.32，CI：0.57-0.07），但与对照组相比没有显着差异。在遵守议定书的个体中，结果表明，IPA组中的个体和久坐的自我效能（3.03，CI：0.28-6.02）和久坐不动的自我效能（3.59，CI：0.35-7.15）和久坐不动的自我效能（4.77，CI：0.59-9.44）与对照组相比群体。这些调查结果表明，干预措施在每次干预组中增加自我效能，以及在IPA集团锻炼中的自主动机，特别是在积极参与励志咨询会议时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号