• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes >State Variability in Peer Review Protections Heightens Liability Risks
【24h】

State Variability in Peer Review Protections Heightens Liability Risks

机译：对等审查保护的状态变异性提高责任风险

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective:To highlight various state-specific gaps in legal protections involving the peer review process with the goal of helping participants better identify and address potential hazards so they may continue to confidently engage in peer review activities.Methods:State laws regarding peer review protections involving privilege and confidentiality were searched through Westlaw (a legal research database) and state government websites and categorized.Results:Gaps in protection were identified in 17 states and the District of Columbia. In the 18 jurisdictions in which potential legal gaps were identified, the most common exceptions involved peer review activities that were initiated without a legally required number of participants, were not formally mandated by the institution or other external body, or that were voluntarily discussed outside of the peer review context by participants in the process.Conclusion:The widespread variability in state-based peer review protections showcases the complexity of deciphering peer review law and emphasizes the need to not just read the relevant state and federal laws but to obtain the professional guidance of a lawyer experienced in peer review law before engaging in peer review activities. These measures will improve providers' engagement in peer review and strengthen an important tool for quality improvement.? 2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译：目的：突出各种国家特定的差距，涉及同行审查进程的目标，以帮助参与者更好地识别和解决潜在的危害，以便他们可以继续自信地参与同行审查活动。方法：关于涉及同行审查保护的国家法律通过Westlaw（法律研究数据库）和州政府网站和州政府网站和分类的特权和机密性。结果：保护中的差距是在17个州和哥伦比亚地区确定。在核查潜在法律差距的18个司法管辖区中，最常见的例外情况涉及在没有合法所需的参与者的情况下发起的同行审查活动，该活动没有正式由机构或其他外部机构正式授权，或者在外面讨论参与者在过程中的同行评审上下文在参与同行评审活动之前在同行评审法中经历的律师。这些措施将改善提供商在同行评审方面的参与度，并加强了质量改进的重要工具。 2020 Mayo医学教育和研究基础。 elsevier公司发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号