• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Behind the Seven Veils of Inequality. What if it's all about the Struggle within just One Half of the Population over just One Half of the National Income?
【24h】

Behind the Seven Veils of Inequality. What if it's all about the Struggle within just One Half of the Population over just One Half of the National Income?

机译：在七个不平等面纱后面。如果一切都在国民收入的一半只有一半的人口中只有一半的斗争，那么怎么办？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article addresses three main issues: why there is such a huge diversity of disposable income inequality across the world, why there is such a deterioration of market inequality among countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and why inequality seems to move in 'waves'. There are many underlying questions: does diversity reflect a variety of fundamentals, or a multiplicity of power structures and choice? Is rising market inequality the product of somehow 'exogenous' factors (e.g., rg), or of complex interactions between political settlements and market failures? How do we get through the veils obscuring these interactions and distorting our vision of the often self-constructed nature of inequality? Has neoliberal globalization broadened the scope for 'distributional failures' by, for example, triggering a process of 'reverse catching-up' in the OECD, so that highly unequal middle-income countries like those in Latin America now embody the shape of things to come? Are we all converging towards features such as mobile elites creaming off the rewards of economic growth, and 'magic realist' politics that lack self-respect if not originality? Should I say, 'Welcome to the Third World'? In this paper I also develop a new approach for examining and measuring inequality (distance from distributive targets), and a new concept of 'distributional waves'. The article concludes that, to understand current distributive dynamics, what matters is to comprehend the forces determining the share of the rich - and, in terms of growth, what they choose to do with it (and how they are allowed do it).
机译：本文涉及三个主要问题：为什么世界各地的可支配收入不平等有巨大多样性，为什么经济合作与发展组织（经合组织）的各国市场不平等劣化，以及为什么不平等似乎进入“波浪”。有许多潜在的问题：多样性是否反映了各种基本面，或多种权力结构和选择？市场不平等是不知何种“外源”因素的产物（例如，r> g），或政治定居点与市场失败之间的复杂互动？我们如何通过面纱模糊这些互动并扭曲我们对不平等的经常自我构建性质的愿景？有新自由主义全球化的范围扩大了“分布失败”的范围，例如，引发经合组织在经合组织的“反向追赶”的过程中，因此高度不平等的中等收入国家，如拉丁美洲的那些现在体现了事物的形状来？我们都融合了移动精英奶油奖励的奖励的功能，以及“魔法现实主义”政治，缺乏自尊，如果不是原创性吗？我应该说，“欢迎来到第三世界”吗？在本文中，我还开发了一种用于检查和测量不平等的新方法（与分配目标的距离）以及“分布波”的新概念。本文得出结论，要了解当前的分配动态，重要的是要理解决定富人的份额 - 而且在增长方面，他们选择与之有关（以及如何允许它们）。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2019年第5期|1133-1213|共81页
  • 作者

    Palma Jose Gabriel;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Cambridge Fac Econ Cambridge England|Univ Santiago USACH Econ Santiago Chile;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号