首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities
【24h】

Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities

机译:基于可持续生计框架的指标,用于评估喜马拉雅社区的气候变化脆弱性和适应性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluated the climate change vulnerability of Himalayan communities, and their potential to adapt to these changes, through assessing their perceived reactions and counter-actions to climate change. The evaluation was conducted through proposing and testing indices for vulnerability (Climate Vulnerability Index-CVI) and adaptation (Current Adaptive Capacity Index-CACI) based on the assumption that a community is an active dynamic entity and has tremendous capability to address the impacts of climate change through an ability to make adjustments based on perceived experiences. Both CVI and CACI include the five forms of capital leading to sustainable livelihood,i.e. human, natural, financial, social and physical capital, and were assessed for each of these forms of capital based on the IPCC framework of vulnerability assessment and its three dimensions (exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity). Data for the analysis were collected from randomly selected households located away from district headquarters (ADH) and near district headquarters (NDH). Each dimension was measured based on associated socio-environment-specific indicators for assessing vulnerability and sustainability at community level. The results showed that ADH households had higher human capital and natural capital vulnerability than NDH households. In contrast, NDH households had higher social capital and financial capital vulnerability than ADH households. Overall, ADH households had greater vulnerability than NDH households.
机译:这项研究通过评估喜马拉雅社区对气候变化的感知反应和对策,评估了喜马拉雅社区气候变化的脆弱性及其适应这些变化的潜力。评估是通过提出和测试脆弱性指数(气候脆弱性指数-CVI)和适应性指数(当前适应能力指数-CACI)进行的,其前提是社区是一个活跃的动态实体,并且具有应对气候影响的强大能力通过根据感知的经验进行调整的能力来进行更改。 CVI和CACI都包括导致可持续生计的五种资本形式,即人力,自然,财务,社会和物质资本,并根据IPCC脆弱性评估框架及其三个维度(暴露,敏感性,适应能力)对每种形式的资本进行了评估。分析的数据是从远离地区总部(ADH)和地区总部(NDH)的随机选择的家庭中收集的。基于相关的特定社会环境指标对每个维度进行了评估,以评估社区一级的脆弱性和可持续性。结果表明,ADH家庭比NDH家庭具有更高的人力资本和自然资本脆弱性。相反,NDH家庭比ADH家庭具有更高的社会资本和金融资本脆弱性。总体而言,ADH家庭比NDH家庭的脆弱性更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号