首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >REPLY TO PUTNAM AND WALSH
【24h】

REPLY TO PUTNAM AND WALSH

机译:回复PUTNAM和WALSH

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social thinkers frequently remind us that people differ on what constitutes personal well-being, but that even when they don't differ, they disagree over the extent to which one person's well-being can be permitted to be traded off against another's. They tell us that political differences are to be traced to differences in people's conceptions of personal and social well-being. We are given to understand, in other words, that people's ethics differ.
机译:社会思想家经常提醒我们,人们在构成个人福祉方面存在差异,但是即使他们没有差异,他们在允许一个人的福祉与他人的福祉之间进行权衡的程度上也存在分歧。他们告诉我们,政治差异应追溯到人们对个人和社会福祉的观念上的差异。换句话说,我们被理解为人们的道德观念是不同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号