• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >PRUDENCE AND JUSTICE
【24h】

PRUDENCE AND JUSTICE

机译：诚信与正义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Whereas principles of justice adjudicate interpersonal conflicts, principles of prudence adjudicate intrapersonal conflicts - i.e., conflicts between the preferences an individual has now and the preferences he will have later. On a contractarian approach, principles of justice can be theoretically grounded in a hypothetical agreement in an appropriately specified pre-moral situation in which those persons with conflicting claims have representatives pushing for their claims. Similarly, I claim, principles of prudence can be grounded in a hypothetical agreement in an appropriately specified pre-prudential situation in which those temporal parts of a person with conflicting claims have representatives as advocates of their claims. During the course of developing the prudential contractarian methodology, I consider a dispute between those who would see principles of justice as the outcome of a choice (e.g., Rawls) and others (e.g., Gauthier) who argue for viewing principles of justice as the outcome of a bargain. I contend that the reasons I adduce in favor of viewing principles of prudence as the outcome of a choice weigh equally in favor of viewing principles of justice as the outcome of a bargain.
机译：正义原则裁定人际冲突，审慎原则裁定人际冲突，即个人现在的偏好与他以后的偏好之间的冲突。在契约论方法下，正义原则可以在适当指定的道德前状况下以理论上的假设为基础，在这些前提下，那些主张相抵触的人都有代表要求其主张。同样，我主张，审慎原则可以在适当规定的审慎情况下以假设的协议为基础，在这种情况下，主张相抵触的人的那些短暂的部分都有代表作为主张其主张的代表。在制定审慎的合同制方法论的过程中，我认为那些将正义原则视为选择的结果的人（例如罗尔斯）和其他主张将正义原则视为结果的人（例如高迪耶）之间存在争议。讨价还价。我认为，我之所以赞成将审慎原则视为选择的结果，是出于同样的理由赞成将正义原则视为讨价还价的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号