See U in court

首页> 外文期刊>The economist >See U in court

【24h】

See U in court

机译：在法庭上见你

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

It is hard to have an argument with only one person in the room, but the Philippines is having a go. On July 13th a tribunal in The Hague concluded a first week of hearings related to its bitter dispute with China over maritime boundaries in the South China Sea. China insists that its claim, which covers most of the vast and strategically vital sea, is not a matter for foreign judges, and was not represented. Such has been China's position ever since the Philippines lodged a case in 2013 at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, arguing that the U-shaped, nine-dashed line used by China to define its claim is illegal. But in its anxiety to dismiss the validity of the case, China may have blundered. The tribunal has ruled that documents issued by China to explain its objections "constitute, in effect, a plea". The tribunal has sent all the relevant papers to the Chinese government and given it time to respond. China has become a participant in the case, despite its absence.

机译：在房间里只有一个人很难吵架，但菲律宾正在努力。 7月13日，海牙一个法庭结束了与海牙在南中国海边界问题上与中国的激烈争端有关的第一周听证会。中国坚持认为，它的要求涵盖了广阔的，具有战略意义的大部分海洋，这不是外国法官的事，也没有代表。自菲律宾于2013年在海牙常设仲裁法院提起诉讼以来，中国就一直持这种立场。该国辩称，中国用来定义其主张的U形，九点划线是非法的。但是由于急于驳回该案的效力，中国可能犯了大错。仲裁庭裁定，中国发布的解释其反对意见的文件“实际上构成了认罪”。仲裁庭已将所有相关文件发送给中国政府，并给予时间答复。尽管没有参加，但中国已成为该案的参与者。

著录项

来源
《The economist》 |2015年第8947期|34-34|共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Illumina, Inc. v. TDL Genetics Ltd.High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Patents Court, 2017No. HP-2016-000001, [2017] EWHC 2930 (PAT) [J] . Biotechnology Law Report . 2018,第1期

机译：Illumina，Inc.V.TDL Genetics Ltd.
英国的高等法院，英格兰和威尔士专利法院的商务和物业法院，2017年
。 HP-2016-000001，[2017] EWHC 2930（PAT）
2. Quo Vadis General Election Dispute Handling: Between the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court or Election Court [J] . La Ode Bariun Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization . 2016,第4期

机译：Qua Vadis大选争议处理：宪法法院，最高法院或选举法院之间
3. Court fees, criminal courts charges, court closures. [J] . The Barrister . 2016,第2016期

机译：法院费用，刑事法院费用，法院关闭。
4. The Effect of Organizational Culture and Information Technology on Employee Performance with Employee Satisfaction as a Mediator in The Electronic Court System (E-Court) in District Court of Sleman, Yogyakarta [C] . Muhammad Luthfi Hendrato, Arief Subyantoro, Wisnalmawati International Conference on Sustainable Innovation - Accounting and Management . 2021

机译：组织文化与信息技术对员工满意度作为员工院制（电子法院）在地区法院的员工绩效的影响，Yogyakarta
5. An Empirical Study of the Political Party Balance Requirement of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and Its Predecessor-Court, the United States Court of Military Appeals, from 1951 to 2016 [D] . Anderson, David A. 2017

机译：1951年至2016年美国武装部队及其前身上诉法院对政党平衡要求的实证研究
6. Court as a health intervention to advance Canada’s achievement of the sustainable development goals : a multi-pronged analysis of Vancouver’s Downtown Community Court [O] . Regiane A. Garcia, Kristi Heather Kenyon, Claire E. Brolan, 2019

机译：法院作为健康干预措施以促进加拿大实现可持续发展目标：对温哥华市中心社区法院的多方面分析
7. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。

See U in court

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅