Court orders

首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Court orders

【24h】

Court orders

机译：法院命令

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Earlier this year the Supreme People's Court sent a letter to a top Chinese leader with the information that courts were not working quite as they should. They were being meddled with, and not allowed to do their jobs independently. Sometimes people were being convicted for crimes they had not committed. The letter, described last month by Southern Metropolis Daily, a Guangdong-based newspaper, marked the beginning of a remarkable shift in official attitudes towards the judicial system in China. The shift culminated at a plenum of the Communist Party's central committee in November. It declared that henceforth the criminal-justice system should end false confessions gained by torture, abolish "reeducation through labour" camps, reduce the number of crimes punishable by death and be more independent and transparent. Police, prosecutors and judges should "protect human rights" and "let the masses feel equality and justice in every verdict."

机译：今年早些时候，最高人民法院给中国最高领导人发了一封信，信中说法院没有按照应有的方式运作。他们被干预，不允许他们独立地工作。有时，人们因未曾犯下的罪行而被定罪。这封信是广东省报纸《南方都市报》上个月描述的，标志着官方对中国司法制度态度发生了显着转变。这种转变在11月的共产党中央委员会全体会议上达到高潮。它宣布，今后，刑事司法系统应结束酷刑获得的虚假供认，废除“劳教”营地，减少应判处死刑的犯罪数量，并更加独立和透明。警察，检察官和法官应“保护人权”，“让群众在每项判决中都享有平等和正义”。

著录项

来源
《The economist》 |2013年第8865期|34-34|共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Illumina, Inc. v. TDL Genetics Ltd.High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Patents Court, 2017No. HP-2016-000001, [2017] EWHC 2930 (PAT) [J] . Biotechnology Law Report . 2018,第1期

机译：Illumina，Inc.V.TDL Genetics Ltd.
英国的高等法院，英格兰和威尔士专利法院的商务和物业法院，2017年
。 HP-2016-000001，[2017] EWHC 2930（PAT）
2. Quo Vadis General Election Dispute Handling: Between the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court or Election Court [J] . La Ode Bariun Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization . 2016,第4期

机译：Qua Vadis大选争议处理：宪法法院，最高法院或选举法院之间
3. Court fees, criminal courts charges, court closures. [J] . The Barrister . 2016,第2016期

机译：法院费用，刑事法院费用，法院关闭。
4. The Effect of Organizational Culture and Information Technology on Employee Performance with Employee Satisfaction as a Mediator in The Electronic Court System (E-Court) in District Court of Sleman, Yogyakarta [C] . Muhammad Luthfi Hendrato, Arief Subyantoro, Wisnalmawati International Conference on Sustainable Innovation - Accounting and Management . 2021

机译：组织文化与信息技术对员工满意度作为员工院制（电子法院）在地区法院的员工绩效的影响，Yogyakarta
5. An Empirical Study of the Political Party Balance Requirement of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and Its Predecessor-Court, the United States Court of Military Appeals, from 1951 to 2016 [D] . Anderson, David A. 2017

机译：1951年至2016年美国武装部队及其前身上诉法院对政党平衡要求的实证研究
6. Court as a health intervention to advance Canada’s achievement of the sustainable development goals : a multi-pronged analysis of Vancouver’s Downtown Community Court [O] . Regiane A. Garcia, Kristi Heather Kenyon, Claire E. Brolan, 2019

机译：法院作为健康干预措施以促进加拿大实现可持续发展目标：对温哥华市中心社区法院的多方面分析
7. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。

Court orders

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅