首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Whose Right To Bear Arms?
【24h】

Whose Right To Bear Arms?

机译:谁拥有武器权?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gun laws are a matter of life and death, reckoned both groups of protesters outside the Supreme Court on March 18th. One side argued that sensible curbs on gun ownership save lives. The other side retorted that if you outlaw guns, only criminals will carry them. Plus the police, of course, but gun-lovers don't find that terribly reassuring. "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away," read one placard.rnThe oddly punctuated second amendment to America's constitution says: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Does this mean that all Americans may own guns, or only those who serve in a militia? Oddly, given how emotive this dispute is, the Supreme Court has never settled it. But the case of District of Columbia v Heller, which was argued this week, gives it a chance to do just that.
机译:3月18日,最高法院外的两组抗议者都认为,枪支法律是生死攸关的问题。一方认为,合理控制枪支所有权可以挽救生命。另一方反驳说,如果您取缔枪支,只有罪犯会携带。当然,还有警察,但是热爱枪支的人并不觉得这令人放心。一张标语牌上写着:“数秒之内,警察就只有几分钟的路程。”对美国宪法第二次修正的措词有些奇怪,他说:“一个规范良好的民兵,对于一个自由国家的安全是必不可少的,人民有权享有并携带武器,不得侵权。”这是否意味着所有美国人都可能拥有枪支,或者仅是那些在民兵中服役的人?奇怪的是,考虑到这一争议的影响力,最高法院从未解决过。但是,本周争论的哥伦比亚特区诉海勒一案使它有机会这样做。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2008年第8572期|5457|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号