...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Split incentive effects on the adoption of technical and behavioral energy-saving measures in the household sector in Western Europe
【24h】

Split incentive effects on the adoption of technical and behavioral energy-saving measures in the household sector in Western Europe

机译：对西欧家庭部门采用技术和行为节能措施的分裂促进作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Significant differences in the adoption of energy-saving measures between homeowners and renters were found in the survey data of 1,248 households from the Netherlands, Germany, and Belgium. In this study, we examined the influence of split incentive effects between homeowners and renters, which stem from differences between those who pay and those who enjoy the benefits of the adoption of energy-efficient (EE) technology and energy-saving behaviors. Average marginal effects were used to measure the magnitude of the "split incentive" effect by considering many EE technologies and energy-saving behaviors. Both split incentive effects were measured and compared for the first time, producing some interesting results. There is clear evidence of split incentive problems for both measures, and on average, homeowners were found to be16.08% more likely than renters to have access to adoptable EE technologies, while the effects were much smaller (only 4.28%) for adopting behavioral measures. The results were highly robust for household characteristics and specific psychological determinants, such as willingness-to-pay and environmental beliefs. Policy implications are provided to address the split incentive problems in rental markets in household sectors, based on our results.
机译：在荷兰，德国和比利时1,248户家庭的调查数据中发现了房屋和租房之间采用节能措施的显着差异。在这项研究中，我们研究了房主和租房者之间分裂激励效应的影响，这些租房者之间的影响源于支付的人之间的差异以及那些享受节能（EE）技术和节能行为的利益的差异。通过考虑许多EE技术和节能行为来利用平均边际效应来测量“分裂激励”效应的大小。均测量并比较了分裂激励效果首次进行比较，产生一些有趣的结果。对于两种措施的分歧措施，以及平均而言，房主可以获得比租柜更有可能获得可采用的EE技术，效果更小（仅为4.28％），以获得足够的措施，而采取行为的措施措施。结果对于家庭特征和特定的心理决定簇非常稳健，例如意愿 - 付费和环境信仰。提供政策影响，以解决家庭部门租赁市场的分裂激励问题，根据我们的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2020年第5期|111424.1-111424.9|共9页
  • 作者

    Nie Hongguang; Kemp Rene; Xu Jin-Hua; Vasseur Veronique; Fan Ying;

  • 作者单位

    Changchun Univ Sci & Technol Sch Econ & Management Changchun Peoples R China|Chinese Acad Sci Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res Inst Sci & Dev Beijing Peoples R China;

    Maastricht Univ Maastricht Sustainabil Inst Maastricht Netherlands|Maastricht Univ UNU MERIT Maastricht Netherlands;

    Chinese Acad Sci Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res Inst Sci & Dev Beijing Peoples R China;

    Maastricht Univ Maastricht Sustainabil Inst Maastricht Netherlands;

    Beihang Univ Sch Econ & Management Beijing Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Split incentive effect; Energy efficient option adoption; Household energy-saving measures; Probit regression;

    机译：分裂激励效果;节能期权采用;家庭节能措施;概率回归;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号