...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Parametric analysis of technology and policy tradeoffs for conventional and electric light-duty vehicles
【24h】

Parametric analysis of technology and policy tradeoffs for conventional and electric light-duty vehicles

机译:常规和电动轻型车辆技术和政策权衡的参数分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A parametric analysis is used to examine the supply demand interactions between the US light-duty vehicle (LDV) fleet, its fuels, and the corresponding primary energy sources through 2050. The analysis emphasizes competition between conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, including hybrids, and electric vehicles (EVs), represented by both plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. We find that EV market penetration could double relative to our baseline case with policies to extend consumers' effective payback period to 7 years. EVs can also reduce per vehicle petroleum consumption by up to 5% with opportunities to increase that fraction at higher adoption rates. However, EVs have limited ability to reduce LDV greenhouse gas (GHC) emissions with the current energy source mix. Alone, EVs cannot drive compliance with the most aggressive GHG emission reduction targets, even if the electricity grid shifts towards natural gas powered sources. Since ICEs will dominate the LDV fleet for up to 40 years, conventional vehicle efficiency improvements have the greatest potential for reductions in LDV GHG emissions and petroleum consumption over this time. Specifically, achieving fleet average efficiencies of 72 mpg or greater can reduce average GHG emissions by 70% and average petroleum consumption by 81%.
机译:进行参数分析可检查到2050年美国轻型汽车(LDV)车队,其燃料和相应的主要能源之间的供应需求相互作用。该分析强调传统内燃机(ICE)车辆之间的竞争,包括混合动力和电动汽车(EV),以插电式混合动力汽车和电池电动汽车为代表。我们发现,通过将消费者的有效投资回收期延长至7年的政策,相对于我们的基准案例,电动汽车市场渗透率可能翻​​倍。电动汽车还可将每辆车的石油消耗减少多达5%,并有机会以更高的采用率提高这一比例。然而,利用当前的能源组合,电动汽车减少LDV温室气体(GHC)排放的能力有限。即使电网转向天然气动力源,电动汽车也无法独自实现最积极的温室气体减排目标。由于ICE将在LDV车队中占据主导地位长达40年,因此在这段时间内,常规车辆效率的提高具有减少LDV温室气体排放和石油消耗的最大潜力。具体而言,实现车队平均效率达到72 mpg或更高可将平均GHG排放量减少70%,将平均石油消耗量减少81%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2012年第7期|p.473-488|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

    Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, CA 94551, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    electric vehicle; greenhouse gas; oil consumption;

    机译:电动汽车温室气体;油耗;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号