...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: A review of the evidence and methodological implications
【24h】

Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: A review of the evidence and methodological implications

机译：公众对氢和燃料电池汽车的态度和需求：证据和方法学意义的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is now widely recognized that effective communication and demand-side policies for alternative energy require sound knowledge of preferences and determinants of demand of the public and consumers. To date, public attitudes towards new transport technologies have been studied under very different conceptual frameworks. This paper gives an overview of the various conceptual frameworks and methodologies used, where four main approaches can be distinguished: general attitudinal surveys, risk perception studies, non-market economic valuation studies, and other approaches such as those based on semiotic theory. We then review the findings of the recent literature on acceptance, attitudes and preferences for hydrogen and fuel cell end-use technologies, focusing on vehicles. These studies are then contrasted with related research into alternative fuel vehicles. The paper finally discusses the main trends in research and avenues for further work in this field. We recommend, among other things, the use of approaches that build knowledge and familiarity with the technology prior to the exploration of attitudes, and the set up of studies that take a whole-systems perspective of hydrogen technologies and that look at hydrogen in the context of other competing clean technologies.
机译：如今，人们广泛认识到，有效的交流和替代能源政策需要对公共和消费者需求的偏好和决定因素有充分的了解。迄今为止，已经在非常不同的概念框架下研究了公众对新运输技术的态度。本文概述了所使用的各种概念框架和方法，其中可以区分出四种主要方法：一般态度调查，风险感知研究，非市场经济评估研究以及其他方法，例如基于符号学的方法。然后，我们将对氢和燃料电池最终用途技术的接受程度，态度和偏好的最新文献进行回顾，重点是车辆。然后将这些研究与对代用燃料汽车的相关研究进行对比。最后，本文讨论了该领域的主要研究趋势和进一步开展工作的途径。我们建议，除其他外，建议使用在探索态度之前建立对技术的知识和熟悉度的方法，以及建立以氢能技术的全系统视角并在背景下考察氢能的研究方案其他竞争性清洁技术。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2010年第10期|p.5301-5310|共10页
  • 作者

    Maria Yetano Roche; Susana Mourato; Manfred Fischedick; Katja Pietzner; Peter Viebahn;

  • 作者单位

    Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Energy and Environment, PO BOX 100480, 42004 Wuppertal, Germany Department of Geography & Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE;

    rnDepartment of Geography & Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE;

    rnWuppertal Institute for Climate, Energy and Environment, PO BOX 100480, 42004 Wuppertal, Germany;

    rnWuppertal Institute for Climate, Energy and Environment, PO BOX 100480, 42004 Wuppertal, Germany;

    rnWuppertal Institute for Climate, Energy and Environment, PO BOX 100480, 42004 Wuppertal, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    attitudes; preferences; hydrogen and fuel cells;

    机译：态度;偏好;氢和燃料电池;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号