• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment international >WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders
【24h】

WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders

机译：世卫组织/劳工组织与工作有关的疾病和伤害负担：关于长时间工作以及长期工作对饮酒和酗酒障碍的影响进行系统评价的协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are developing a joint methodology for estimating the national and global work-related burden of disease and injury (WHO/ILO joint methodology), with contributions from a large network of experts. In this paper, we present the protocol for two systematic reviews of parameters for estimating the number of deaths and disability-adjusted life years of ischaemic heart disease from exposure to long working hours, to inform the development of the WHO/ILO joint methodology.ObjectivesWe aim to systematically review studies on occupational exposure to long working hours (Systematic Review 1) and systematically review and meta-analyse estimates of the effect of long working hours on ischaemic heart disease (Systematic Review 2), applying the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology as an organizing framework. The selection of both, the exposure and the health outcome is justified by substantial scientific evidence on adverse effects of long working hours on ischaemic heart disease risk.Data sourcesSeparately for Systematic Reviews 1 and 2, we will search electronic academic databases for potentially relevant records from published and unpublished studies, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, CISDOC and PsychINFO. We will also search electronic grey literature databases, Internet search engines and organizational websites; hand-search reference list of previous systematic reviews and included study records; and consult additional experts.Study eligibility and criteriaWe will include working-age (≥15 years) workers in the formal and informal economy in any WHO and/or ILO Member State, but exclude children (<15 years) and unpaid domestic workers. For Systematic Review 1, we will include quantitative prevalence studies of relevant levels of exposure to long working hours (i.e. 35–40, 41–48, 49–54 and ≥55 h/week) stratified by country, sex, age and industrial sector or occupation. For Systematic Review 2, we will include randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and other non-randomized intervention studies with an estimate of the relative effect of relevant level(s) of long working hours on the prevalence of, incidence of or mortality from ischaemic heart disease, compared with the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (i.e. 35–40 h/week).Study appraisal and synthesis methodsAt least two review authors will independently screen titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria at a first stage and full texts of potentially eligible records at a second stage, followed by extraction of data from qualifying studies. At least two review authors will assess risk of bias and the quality of evidence, using the most suited tools currently available. For Systematic Review 2, if feasible, we will combine relative risks using meta-analysis. We will report results using the guidelines for accurate and transparent health estimates reporting (GATHER) for Systematic Review 1 and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA) for Systematic Review 2.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017084243.
机译：背景世界卫生组织（WHO）和国际劳工组织（ILO）在大型专家网络的协助下，正在开发一种联合方法，以估算与工作相关的国家和全球疾病和伤害负担（WHO / ILO联合方法）。 。在本文中，我们提出了对两个系统评价参数的协议，以评估从暴露于长时间工作导致的缺血性心脏病的死亡人数和残疾调整生命年数，以指导WHO / ILO联合方法的发展。 n目标我们的目标是应用《导航指南》系统综述方法，系统地审查关于长时间工作的职业暴露的研究（系统评价1），并系统地回顾和荟萃分析长时间工作对缺血性心脏病的影响（系统评价2）。作为组织框架。大量的科学证据证明了长时间工作对缺血性心脏病的不良影响，因此可以选择暴露和健康的结果。 n数据来源分别针对系统评价1和2，我们将在电子学术数据库中搜索潜在的相关记录来自已发表和未发表的研究，Medline，EMBASE，Web of Science，CISDOC和PsychINFO。我们还将搜索灰色电子文献数据库，互联网搜索引擎和组织网站；手工检索以前的系统评价参考清单，并包括研究记录； n研究资格和标准我们将包括世界卫生组织和/或国际劳工组织任何成员国的正规和非正规经济中的工作年龄（≥15岁）工人，但不包括儿童（<15岁）和无薪家政工人。对于系统评价1，我们将包括按国家，性别，年龄和工业部门分层的长期工作时间（即35-40、41-48、49-54和≥55h /周）的相关暴露水平的定量患病率研究或职业。对于系统评价2，我们将包括随机对照试验，队列研究，病例对照研究和其他非随机干预研究，并评估长时间工作水平的相关水平对患病率，发病率的相对影响。或缺血性心脏病的死亡率，与理论上的最低风险暴露水平（即35-40h /周）相比。 n研究评估和综合方法在第一阶段，至少有两位评价作者将针对资格标准独立筛选标题和摘要，在第二阶段收集可能符合条件的记录的全文，然后从符合条件的研究中提取数据。至少有两名评论作者将使用当前最合适的工具评估偏见风险和证据质量。对于系统评价2，如果可行，我们将使用荟萃分析结合相对风险。我们将使用系统评价1的准确，透明的健康评估报告指南（GATHER）以及系统评价2的首选报告项目和系统评价2的荟萃分析指南（PRISMA）报告结果。PROSPERO注册号：CRD42017084243。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment international》 |2018年第11期|22-33|共12页
  • 作者

    Jian Li; Chantal Brisson; Els Clays; Marco M. Ferrario; Ivan D. Ivanov; Paul Landsbergis; Nancy Leppink; Frank Pega; Hynek Pikhart; Annette Prüss-Üstün; Reiner Rugulies; Peter L. Schnall; Gretchen Stevens; Akizumi Tsutsumi; Yuka Ujita; Johannes Siegrist;

  • 作者单位

    Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf;

    Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Université Laval;

    Department of Public Health, Ghent University;

    Research Centre EPIMED, University of Insubria;

    Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization;

    State University of New York-Downstate School of Public Health;

    Labour Administration, Labour Inspection and Occupational Safety and Health Branch, International Labour Organization;

    Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization;

    Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London;

    Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization;

    National Research Centre for the Working Environment,Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen,Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen;

    Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California-Irvine;

    Department of Information, Evidence and Research, World Health Organization;

    Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kitasato University;

    Labour Administration, Labour Inspection and Occupational Safety and Health Branch, International Labour Organization;

    Life Science Centre, University of Düsseldorf;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号