首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
【24h】

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

机译:美国第三审上诉法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental group did not waive its claims challenging Clean Water Act dredge and fill permit issued by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for natural gas pipeline project, because, even if prudential waiver rule applicable to National Environmental Policy Act challenges applies to challenges under Clean Water Act: (1) even though group did not raise its compression facility alternative objections before Federal Energy Regulatory Commission NEPA environmental assessment proceedings for project, objections were otherwise brought before corps, and (2) group was not required to bring objections to corps' compliance with Clean Water Act practicable alternative requirements before FERC in NEPA proceedings.
机译:环保组织没有放弃对美国陆军工程兵团针对天然气管道项目颁发的《清洁水法》挖泥机和填水许可证的要求,因为即使适用于《国家环境政策法》的审慎弃权规则适用于《清洁水法》的挑战: (1)即使小组没有在联邦能源监管委员会NEPA项目环境评估程序之前提出其压缩设施替代异议,但异议仍会被提出给军团;(2)小组也无需提出异议,以使军团遵守Clean在NEPA程序中,《水法》在FERC之前可行的替代要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2017年第1期|1021-1035|共15页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号