首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
【24h】

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

机译:美国路易斯安那州中部地区法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental group has not established it has standing to bring Clean Air Act citizen suit against chemical manufacturer for allegedly emitting air pollutants in excess of permit limits and submitting unauthorized discharge reports without all required information, because, even though group established that members of group suffered injury in fact and that alleged injury is fairly traceable to manufacturer's alleged violations: (1) manufacturer entered into settlement agreement with Louisiana agency for previously alleged violations, and (2) group did not establish that current violations it alleges are not governed by agreement or that agreement is not being diligently prosecuted and that group's claims could be redressed by judicial action.
机译:环保组织尚未确定其有资格起诉化学制造商,因为其涉嫌排放超出许可限制的空气污染物,并在未提供所有必需信息的情况下提交未经授权的排放报告,因为化学品制造商声称,该小组成员遭受了伤害实际上,所谓的伤害可追溯到制造商的所谓违法行为:(1)制造商与路易斯安那州机构就先前声称的违规行为达成和解协议,并且(2)集团未确定其声称的当前违法行为不受协议约束或协议并未得到认真起诉,该团体的主张可以通过司法行动解决。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2017年第1期|1058-1065|共8页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号