...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Ozone Rule Should Be Remanded To EPA, Los Angeles-Area Regulators Say
【24h】

Ozone Rule Should Be Remanded To EPA, Los Angeles-Area Regulators Say

机译：洛杉矶地区监管机构称，臭氧规则应退还给EPA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Environmental Protection Agency wrongly concluded that it was unable to allow states to meet "reasonable further progress" obligations under the 2008 ozone standards by taking credit for reductions of ozone precursors from sources outside of a nonattainment area, Los Angeles-area air quality regulators told a federal appeals court (South Coast Air Quality Mgmt Dist. v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 15-1115, brief filed 3/16/16). The South Coast Air Quality Management District, in a March 16 brief, said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit should remand the agency's implementation rule for the 75 parts per billion ozone standards to allow for the agency to use its discretion to interpret ambiguous Clean Air Act language. The local air regulator argued that the EPA wrongly concluded that a 2009 court decision on different Clean Air Act requirements barred the agency from allowing reasonable further progress obligations to be met by cutting emissions from upwind areas.
机译：洛杉矶地区空气质量监管机构告诉美国环境保护署错误地得出结论，它无法允许各州履行2008年臭氧标准所规定的“合理的进一步进展”义务，原因是该国承认减少了未达标区域之外的排放源中的臭氧前体。联邦上诉法院（South Coast Air Quality Mgmt Dist。诉EPA，DC Cir。，第15-1115号，摘要于3/16/16提交）。南海岸空气质量管理区在3月16日的简报中说，美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院应将该机构对十亿分之75臭氧标准的执行规则还本，以便该机构可以自行决定解释模糊的《清洁空气法》语言。当地的空气监管机构认为，EPA错误地得出结论，2009年法院针对《清洁空气法》的不同要求做出的决定，禁止该机构允许通过削减上风区的排放量来履行合理的进一步进展义务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号