...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >'When to Take 'No' for an Answer'? Using Entreaties to Reduce Protests in Contingent Valuation Studies
【24h】

'When to Take 'No' for an Answer'? Using Entreaties to Reduce Protests in Contingent Valuation Studies

机译：“什么时候回答“不”？在临时评估研究中使用实体来减少抗议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We report the results of two field experiments to investigate the usefulness of entreaties in reducing protest zero responses in contingent valuation (CV) studies. These two experiments estimate willingness to pay for tropical biodiversity amongst distant beneficia ries and for reductions in water supply risks, respectively. The entreaties in both contexts, in essence, entailed an additional text to 'talk people out of their protests' using, respectively, a split sample test and a within sample test. Results indicate that, in both cases, these scripts were effective in significantly reducing protest zeros, with one experiment reducing protests at the payment principle stage of the valuation scenario and the other reducing protests at the payment elicitation stage. Using entreaties in this way tentatively may be a useful con tribution to the existing CV literature where protests rates are high and, moreover, appear to 'defy' efforts to address the issue through best practice in the design and testing of survey instruments. However, while protests were reduced by about a third in both cases, the entreat ies clearly did not eliminate a majority of protest zeros. Moreover, as we discuss, there are good reasons why the responses of 'reclaimed' protestors remain open to scrutiny.
机译：我们报告了两个现场实验的结果，以调查恳求在减少或有评估（CV）研究中的抗议零回应方面的有用性。这两个实验分别估计了为远距离受益的热带生物多样性付出的代价和减少供水风险的意愿。从本质上讲，这两种情况下的诉求都需要使用额外的文本，分别使用拆分样本测试和内部样本测试“使人们摆脱抗议”。结果表明，在这两种情况下，这些脚本均有效地显着减少了抗议零，其中一个实验减少了估值方案的付款原则阶段的抗议，而另一个实验减少了付款引发阶段的抗议。尝试以这种方式使用实体可能是对现有CV文献的有用贡献，在这些文献中，抗议率很高，而且似乎“无视”通过设计和测试调查仪器的最佳实践来解决该问题的努力。然而，尽管两种情况下的抗议活动都减少了约三分之一，但进入场馆显然并没有消除大多数抗议活动零。此外，正如我们所讨论的那样，“收回”示威者的反应仍然有待审查的充分理由。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental & Resource Economics》 |2012年第4期|p.497-523|共27页
  • 作者

    Giles Atkinson; Sian Morse-Jones; Susana Mourato; Allan Provins;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Geography and Environment and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. London School of Economics and Political Science,Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK;

    Department of Geography and Environment and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. London School of Economics and Political Science,Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK;

    Ecosystem Services and Environmental Markets.Fauna and Flora International, Jupiter House, Station Road,Cambridge CBI 2JD, UK;

    Economics for the Environment Consulting (eftec) Ltd.. 73-75 Mortimer Street, London WIW 7SQ. UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    contingent valuation; protest responses; entreaties;

    机译：或有估值抗议回应;恳求;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号