• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >Evaluating governance processes in the sharing of revenues from wildlife tourism and hunting in Ethiopia
【24h】

Evaluating governance processes in the sharing of revenues from wildlife tourism and hunting in Ethiopia

机译：评估埃塞俄比亚野生生物旅游和狩猎收益分享中的治理程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Sharing of benefits from nature conservation is widely regarded as a way to enhance local residents' support for protected areas. While in past years, the effectiveness of such approaches has been investigated in detail, governance processes underpinning benefit sharing have received less attention. This study examines the legislation and implementation practice of a revenue sharing scheme in southern Ethiopia, an area that is currently undergoing substantial social and environmental changes that threaten livelihoods and ecosystems. Based on qualitative data from interviews, group discussions and workshops, four main areas of shortcomings in the current legislation and implementation practice were identified: information provision; imbalanced roles and responsibilities; compromised accountability; and the lack of connection between revenue and wildlife tourism in the minds of the recipients. While some of these factors fostered misunderstandings and misuse of the monies, others meant that even where revenue was disbursed it was not connected with wildlife conservation, and thus did not have the intended effect. A comparison between these factors and those in the literature on the evaluation of comanagement arrangements revealed substantial overlap. Revenue sharing may be regarded as part of the comanagement of wildlife areas, but to be successful the management of these areas needs to be shared, and not just the financial benefits.
机译：共享自然保护的惠益被广泛认为是增强当地居民对保护区的支持的一种方式。尽管在过去几年中，已经对这种方法的有效性进行了详细研究，但作为利益共享基础的治理流程却很少受到关注。这项研究研究了埃塞俄比亚南部的一项收入共享计划的立法和实施实践，埃塞俄比亚南部该地区目前正经历着重大的社会和环境变化，威胁到生计和生态系统。根据采访，小组讨论和讲习班的定性数据，确定了当前立法和实施实践中的四个主要缺陷领域：信息提供；角色和责任不平衡；问责制受损；接收者认为收益与野生动植物旅游之间缺乏联系。尽管这些因素中的一些会引起人们对货币的误解和滥用，但其他一些因素则意味着即使支出了收入，也与野生动植物保护无关，因此没有预期的效果。将这些因素与有关共同管理安排的评估中的因素进行比较后，发现存在实质性的重叠。收益共享可能被视为野生动植物区域共同管理的一部分，但要成功，就必须共享这些区域的管理，而不仅仅是经济利益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Conservation》 |2013年第3期|253-265|共13页
  • 作者

    YITBAREK T. W.; DEGU TADIE; GIRMA TIMER; ANKE FISCHER;

  • 作者单位

    Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 100003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;

    Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 100003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;

    Bureau of Culture and Tourism, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Regional State, PO Box 1078, Awassa, Ethiopia Ministry of Culture and Tourism, PO Box 1907, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;

    Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 100003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The Fames Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    adaptive; benefit sharing; comanagement; Ethiopia; governance; protected areas; wildlife;

    机译：适应性利益分享;共同管理埃塞俄比亚;治理;保护区;野生动物;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号