...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Castles-and Roads-in the Sand: Do All Roads Lead to a 'Taking'?
【24h】

Castles-and Roads-in the Sand: Do All Roads Lead to a 'Taking'?

机译：沙堡中的城堡和道路：所有道路都导致“冒险”吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The law has been slow to acknowledge the unprecedented nature of sea-level rise. Unless and until the law adapts, past case law on coastal hazards exacerbated by sea-level rise provides the best guidance. This Article critically examines a Florida case that addressed local government liability for coastal erosion damage to a road and dramatically altered Florida law in two key respects. First, the case altered and expanded the concept of "maintenance" of road infrastructure by a local government as the baseline duty that must be met to avoid potential legal liability. Second, the case introduced into Florida law the controversial idea that "inaction" may support a Fifth Amendment takings claim. The Article traces how other courts have unwittingly or carelessly introduced "inaction" into their takings jurisprudence, and evaluates whether and when inaction should be sufficient basis for a takings claim. It draws out serious policy implications of the case in light of sea-level rise, and makes recommendations to address fallout from the case.
机译：法律缓慢地承认海平面上升的空前性质。除非并且直到法律有所调整，否则有关海平面上升加剧的沿海灾害的以往判例法提供了最佳指导。本文严格审查了佛罗里达州的一个案例，该案例解决了地方政府对道路沿岸侵蚀造成的损害的赔偿责任，并在两个关键方面大大改变了佛罗里达州的法律。首先，该案改变并扩大了地方政府对道路基础设施的“维护”概念，这是必须履行的基本义务，以避免潜在的法律责任。第二，此案将佛罗里达州法律引入了一个有争议的想法，即“无所作为”可能支持《第五修正案》的索偿要求。该条款追溯了其他法院如何在其收受诉讼法学中无意或不经意地将“不作为”引入其诉讼法理，并评估了不诉讼是否以及何时应作为接受诉讼的充分依据。它从海平面上升的角度得出了该案的严重政策含义，并提出了解决该案后果的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号