• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental law >HOW MUCH EVIDENCE SHOULD WE NEED TO PROTECT CULTURAL SITES AND TREATY RIGHTS?
【24h】

HOW MUCH EVIDENCE SHOULD WE NEED TO PROTECT CULTURAL SITES AND TREATY RIGHTS?

机译：我们应该如何保护文化场所和条约权利？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Too often, the administrative and judicial systems require tribes to reveal too much about their cultural site and treaty rights before agencies and courts are willing or "able" to protect them. Tribes must make a difficult decision whether to reveal information about their cultural site and treaty rights practices, which, when made public, leads to damage, vandalism, and personal safety concerns. To prevent these effects, agencies and courts can, and should, consider these concerns in determining how much detail is needed to constitute "substantial evidence." This Article gives examples from the practice of the Columbia River Gorge Commission, a regional land use planning agency created by an interstate compact between Oregon and Washington, which, by its compact, must engage with the four Columbia River Treaty Tribes and protect cultural resources and treaty rights.
机译：经常经常，行政和司法系统要求部落在机构和法院愿意或“能够”以保护他们之前揭示他们的文化遗产和条约。部落必须做出难度决定是否透露有关他们的文化遗产和条约权利做法的信息，这些权利在公开上导致损害，破坏和个人安全问题。为防止这些效果，机构和法院可以，也应该考虑这些问题，在确定需要“实质性证据”所需的细节。本文举例说明了哥伦比亚河峡谷委员会的实践，由俄勒冈州和华盛顿之间的州际公路契约创造的区域土地利用规划机构，其依靠紧凑，必须与四个哥伦比亚河条约部落进行互动，保护文化资源条约权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental law》 |2020年第2期|447-454|共8页
  • 作者

    JEFFREY B. LITWAK;

  • 作者单位

    Lewis & Clark Law School;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号