...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >The Use of Recreation Planning Tools in U.S. Forest Service NEPA Assessments
【24h】

The Use of Recreation Planning Tools in U.S. Forest Service NEPA Assessments

机译：美国森林服务NEPA评估中休闲计划工具的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

U.S. Forest Service managers are required to incorporate social and biophysical science information in planning and environmental analysis. The use of science is mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, and U.S. Forest Service planning rules. Despite the agency's emphasis on 'science-based' decision-making, little is known about how science is actually used in recreation planning and management. This study investigated the perceptions of Forest Service interdisciplinary (ID) team leaders for 106 NEPA projects dealing with recreation and travel management between 2005 and 2008. Our survey data show how managers rate the importance of social and biophysical science compared to other potential 'success factors' in NEPA assessments. We also explore how team leaders value and use multi-disciplinary tools for recreation-related assessments. Results suggest that managers employ a variety of recreation planning tools in NEPA projects, but there appears to be no common understanding or approach for how or when these tools are incorporated. The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) was the most frequently used planning tool, but the Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) framework was the most consistently valued tool by those who used it. We recommend further evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of each planning tool and future development of procedures to select appropriate planning tools for use in recreation-related NEPA assessments.
机译：美国森林服务经理必须将社会和生物物理科学信息纳入规划和环境分析。 《国家环境政策法》，《国家森林管理法》和《美国森林服务计划规则》规定了科学的使用。尽管该机构强调“基于科学”的决策，但对于娱乐计划和管理中实际使用科学的方式知之甚少。这项研究调查了2005年至2008年之间，林业服务跨学科（ID）团队负责人对106个NEPA项目（涉及休闲和旅行管理）的看法。我们的调查数据显示，与其他潜在的成功因素相比，管理者如何评价社会和生物物理科学的重要性在NEPA评估中。我们还将探讨团队领导者如何重视和使用多学科工具进行与休闲相关的评估。结果表明，管理人员在NEPA项目中采用了多种娱乐计划工具，但是对于如何或何时使用这些工具似乎没有共识。娱乐机会谱（ROS）是最常用的计划工具，但访问者体验和资源保护（VERP）框架是使用它的人最看重的工具。我们建议进一步评估每种计划工具的优缺点，并进一步发展程序，以选择适当的计划工具以用于与娱乐相关的NEPA评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2011年第3期|p.644-657|共14页
  • 作者

    Lee K. Cerveny; Dale J. Blahna; Marc J. Stern; Michael J. Mortimer; S. Andrew Predmore; James Freeman;

  • 作者单位

    Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 400 NW 34th Street, Suite 201, Seattle, WA 98103, USA;

    Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 400 NW 34th Street, Suite 201, Seattle, WA 98103, USA;

    Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 304 Cheatham Hall, 0234, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;

    Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources and Environment, National Capital Region, 7054 Haycock Rd., Falls Church, VA 22043, USA;

    Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 304 Cheatham Hall, 0234, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;

    Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources and Environment, National Capital Region, 7054 Haycock Rd., Falls Church, VA 22043, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    recreation planning; national environmental policy act (NEPA); us forest service; travel management;

    机译：娱乐计划;国家环境政策法案（NEPA）;美国森林服务;差旅管理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号