...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >The Lyon-Turin High-Speed Rail: The Public Debate and Perception of Environmental Risk in Susa Valley, Italy
【24h】

The Lyon-Turin High-Speed Rail: The Public Debate and Perception of Environmental Risk in Susa Valley, Italy

机译:里昂-都灵高铁:意大利苏萨山谷的公共辩论和环境风险感知

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When the construction of the Lyon-Turin segment of the new European high-speed rail network was first publicly announced at the beginning of the 1990s, it immediately found fierce opposition from the inhabitants of Susa Valley, Italy, one of the areas to be cut across by such infrastructure. At issue were the project's potential environmental impact and its consequences on public health. This study intends to clarify environmental risk perception and public debate between the national government, local advocacy groups, and the inhabitants of Susa Valley. Two major phases of public reaction were identified: (1) an initial rebellious period of no real dialog among the project's major stakeholders (exemplified by the popular "No TAV" [No High Speed Train] movement), followed by (2) a yielding period of intense multilateral negotiations centered on the activities of the "Lyon-Turin Environmental Observatory." The results of a qualitative cross analysis of the residents' perception of the proposed high-speed rail revealed that public acceptance of risk in Susa Valley was influenced by the characteristics of hazards perceived by the residents and by the communicative approach used by the project's various stakeholders. It also emerged that early dialog among all the parties involved was critical in forming a personal viewpoint on risk, which, once consolidated, defied new information and perspectives. Likely, a greater and earlier care taken by the otherrnstakeholders to inform and consult the local population about the railway would have greatly eased the public debate.
机译:当新的欧洲高铁网络的里昂-都灵线段的建设在1990年代初首次公开宣布时,立即遭到了来自意大利苏萨山谷居民的强烈反对,而萨苏山谷是其中一个被砍伐的地区。这样的基础设施。问题在于该项目的潜在环境影响及其对公共健康的影响。这项研究旨在澄清国家政府,地方倡导团体和苏萨山谷居民之间的环境风险感知和公众辩论。确定了公众反应的两个主要阶段:(1)最初的叛逆期,该项目的主要利益相关者之间没有进行真正的对话(例如流行的“ No TAV” [No High Speed Train]运动),其次是(2)屈服在激烈的多边谈判期间,以“里昂-都灵环境天文台”的活动为中心。对居民对拟建高铁的看法的定性交叉分析结果表明,苏萨河谷地区公众对风险的接受程度受居民所感知的灾害特征以及项目各利益相关者所采用的沟通方式的影响。还显示出,有关各方之间的早期对话对于形成关于风险的个人观点至关重要,该观点一旦得到整合,就会无视新的信息和观点。可能的是,其他利益相关者采取更大程度的,更早的方式来告知和咨询当地居民有关铁路的知识,将大大简化公众的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号