...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Good faith in environmental alternative dispute resolution: When 'any road' won't do
【24h】

Good faith in environmental alternative dispute resolution: When 'any road' won't do

机译：善于解决环境替代纠纷：何时“一条道路”都行不通

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ADR is now recognised as a legitimate (and enforceable) alternative for parties who have determined, contractually or otherwise, that courts are an inappropriate forum for the determination of conflict. That said however the uniform application of a traditional dispute resolution paradigm (incorporating an ADR framework), will not always be appropriate in the context of environmental conflict, an area which requires if not adherence, certainly reference to, environmental touchstones. It is argued that the integration of a suitably amended construct of good faith is an appropriate vehicle for remedying ADR's inherent flaws. Both good faith and ADR are characterised by their flexibility and inherent capacity for change. Good faith remains open to interpretation in that it is a principle capable of operating in such a way as to promulgate eco-centric values while retaining its salient characteristics as an obligation arising as between the parties.
机译：现在，对于已通过合同或其他方式确定法院是解决冲突的不适当论坛的当事方，ADR被公认为是合法的（且可执行的）替代方案。话虽如此，但在环境冲突的背景下，统一采用传统的争议解决模式（并纳入ADR框架）并不总是合适的，这是一个即使不遵守也必须提及环境试金石的领域。有人认为，适当修改的善意结构的整合是纠正ADR固有缺陷的适当工具。诚信和ADR都具有灵活性和内在的变革能力。诚信仍然可以接受解释，因为它是一项能够以传播生态为中心的价值的原则，同时保留其显着特征作为各方之间产生的义务的原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号