...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Nature-Based Solutions Can Compete with Technology for Mitigating Air Emissions Across the United States
【24h】

Nature-Based Solutions Can Compete with Technology for Mitigating Air Emissions Across the United States

机译:基于自然的解决方案可以与美国范围内减少空气排放的技术竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the proliferation of control technologies, air pollution remains a major concern across the United States, suggesting the need for a paradigm shift in methods for mitigating emissions. Based on data about annual emissions in U.S. counties and current land cover, we show that existing forest, grassland, and shrubland vegetation take up a significant portion of current U.S. emissions. Restoring land cover, where possible, to county-level average canopy cover can further remove pollution of SO2, PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 by an average of 27% through interception of particulate matter and absorption of gaseous pollutants. We find such nature-based solutions to be cheaper than technology for several National Emission Inventory sectors. Our results with and without monetary valuation of ecological cobenefits identify sectors and counties that are most economically attractive for nature-based solutions as compared to the use of pollution control technologies. We also estimate the sizes of urban and rural populations that would benefit from this novel ecosystem-based approach. This suggests that even though vegetation cannot fully negate the impact of emissions at all times, policies encouraging ecosystems as control measures in addition to technological solutions may promote large investments in ecological restoration and provide several societal benefits.
机译:尽管控制技术不断普及,但空气污染仍然是全美国的主要问题,这表明有必要在减少排放的方法上进行范式转变。根据有关美国各县的年度排放量和当前土地覆盖率的数据,我们表明现有的森林,草地和灌木林植被占美国当前排放量的很大一部分。如果可能,将土地覆盖恢复到县级平均树冠覆盖率,可以通过截留颗粒物和吸收气态污染物,进一步将SO2,PM10,PM2.5和NO2的污染平均减少27%。对于某些国家排放清单行业,我们发现这种基于自然的解决方案比技术便宜。我们的结果(带有或不带有生态协同效益的货币估值)确定了与使用污染控制技术相比,对于基于自然的解决方案在经济上最具吸引力的部门和县。我们还估计了将从这种新颖的基于生态系统的方法中受益的城乡人口规模。这表明,即使植被不能始终完全抵消排放的影响,但除技术解决方案外,鼓励生态系统作为控制措施的政策可能会促进对生态恢复的大量投资,并带来若干社会效益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2019年第22期|13228-13237|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Ohio State Univ Lowrie Dept Chem & Biomol Engn Columbus OH 43210 USA|201 Calif St Suite 1200 San Francisco CA 94111 USA;

    Univ Leeds Sch Geog Leeds LS2 9JT W Yorkshire England;

    SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry Davey Inst 5 Moon Lib Syracuse NY 13210 USA;

    Ohio State Univ Lowrie Dept Chem & Biomol Engn Columbus OH 43210 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号