...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Price Corrected Domestic Technology Assumption-A Method To Assess Pollution Embodied in Trade Using Primary Official Statistics Only. With a Case on CO_2 Emissions Embodied in Imports to Europe
【24h】

Price Corrected Domestic Technology Assumption-A Method To Assess Pollution Embodied in Trade Using Primary Official Statistics Only. With a Case on CO_2 Emissions Embodied in Imports to Europe

机译:价格校正的国内技术假设-一种仅使用主要官方统计数据评估贸易中体现的污染的方法。以欧洲进口中体现的CO_2排放为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmentally extended input output (EE IO) analysis is increasingly used to assess the carbon footprint of final consumption. Official EE IO data are, however, at best available for single countries or regions such as the EU27. This causes problems in assessing pollution embodied in imported products. The popular "domestic technology assumption (DTA)" leads to errors. Improved approaches based on Life Cycle Inventory data, Multiregional EE IO tables, etc rely on unofficial research data and modeling, making them difficult to implement by statistical offices. The DTA can lead to errors for three main reasons: exporting countries can have higher impact intensities; may use more intermediate inputs for the same output; or may sell the imported products for lower/other prices than those produced domestically. The last factor is relevant for sustainable consumption policies of importing countries, whereas the first factors are mainly a matter of making production in exporting countries more eco-efficient We elaborated a simple correction for price differences in imports and domestic production using monetary and physical data from official import and export statistics. A case study for the EU27 shows that this "price-adjusted DTA" gives a partial but meaningful adjustment of pollution embodied in trade compared to multiregional EE IO studies.
机译:环境扩展的投入产出(EE IO)分析越来越多地用于评估最终消耗的碳足迹。但是,官方的EE IO数据最多只能在单个国家或地区(例如EU27)获得。这在评估进口产品所含的污染方面引起问题。流行的“国内技术假设(DTA)”会导致错误。基于生命周期清单数据,多区域EE IO表等的改进方法依赖于非官方的研究数据和建模,这使其难以由统计部门实施。 DTA可能会导致错误,原因有以下三个主要原因:出口国的影响强度可能更高;可能将更多中间输入用于同一输出;或可能以低于国内生产价格的价格出售其他进口产品。最后一个因素与进口国的可持续消费政策有关,而第一个因素主要是使出口国的生产更加生态高效。我们使用来自货币市场的货币和实物数据,对进口和国内生产的价格差异进行了简单的修正。官方进出口统计。一项针对EU27的案例研究表明,与多区域EE IO研究相比,这种“价格调整后的DTA”对贸易中体现的污染进行了部分但有意义的调整。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2013年第4期|1775-1783|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Delft, Netherlands,Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Program, Trondheim, Norway;

    Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands;

    Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Program, Trondheim, Norway;

    Eurostat, Luxembourg, Luxembourg;

    University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号