...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >Simulating Honey Bee Large‐Scale Colony Feeding Studies Using the BEEHAVE Model-Part II: Analysis of Overwintering Outcomes
【24h】

Simulating Honey Bee Large‐Scale Colony Feeding Studies Using the BEEHAVE Model-Part II: Analysis of Overwintering Outcomes

机译：使用BEHAVE模型 - 第II部分模拟蜂蜜大规模殖民地饲养研究：过扫描结果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Large-scale colony feeding studies (LSCFSs) aim to assess potential pesticide exposure to and effects on honey bees at the colony level. However, these studies are sometimes affected by high losses of control colonies, indicating that other stressors may impact colonies and confound the analysis of potential pesticide impacts. We assessed the study design and environmental conditions experienced by the untreated control colonies across 7 LSCFSs conducted in North Carolina (USA). Overwintering success differed considerably among the studies, as did their initial colony conditions, amount and timing of sugar feeding, landscape composition, and weather. To assess the effects of these drivers on control colonies' overwintering success, we applied the mechanistic colony model BEEHAVE. Sugar feedings and initial status of the simulated colonies were more important for fall colony condition than were landscape and weather. Colonies that had larger colony sizes and honey stores in the fall were those that began with larger honey stores, were provided more sugar, and had supplemental feedings before the fall. This information can be used to inform the standardization of a study design, which can increase the likelihood of overwintering survival of controls and help ensure that LSCFSs are comparable. Our study demonstrates how a mechanistic model can be used to inform study designs for higher tier effects studies.Environ Toxicol Chem2020;00:1-12. (c) 2020 The Authors.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistrypublished by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
机译：大规模的殖民地喂养研究（LSCFS）旨在评估潜在的农药暴露和对菌落水平的蜂蜜蜜蜂的影响。然而，这些研究有时受到对照菌落的高损失的影响，表明其他压力源可能会影响菌落并混淆潜在的农药影响分析。我们评估了在北卡罗来纳州北卡罗来纳州（美国）进行的7个LSCFS的未经处理的对照菌落经历的研究设计和环境条件。在研究中，越冬的成功差异很大，它们的初始殖民地条件，糖喂养，景观组成和天气的初始殖民地条件，数量和时序。为了评估这些驱动因素对控制殖民地的速度取得的成功的影响，我们应用了机械殖民地模型的壮大。模拟菌落的糖喂料和初始状态对于落下的殖民地状况比景观和天气更重要。秋季殖民地尺寸和蜂蜜商店的殖民地是那些开始使用较大蜂蜜店的殖民地，提供更多糖，并在秋季之前进行补充喂养。该信息可用于通知研究设计的标准化，这可以增加对控制的越冬生存的可能性，并有助于确保LSCFS是可比性的。我们的研究表明了机械模型如何用于向学习设计提供更高层次的效果研究.Environ毒素Chem202020; 00：1-12。 （c）2020作者。由于Wiley期刊LLC代表Setac的环境和化学毒理学和化学毒理学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号