...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter?
【24h】

Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter?

机译：轮班工人的睡眠和恢复需求：年龄和年龄重要吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examined associations of chronotype and age with shift-specific assessments of main sleep duration, sleep quality and need for recovery in a cross-sectional study among N=261 industrial shift workers (96.6% male). Logistic regression analyses were used, adjusted for gender, lifestyle, health, nap behaviour, season of assessment and shift schedule. Shift workers with latest versus earliest chronotype reported a shorter sleep duration (OR 11.68, 95% CI 3.31-41.17) and more awakenings complaints (OR 4.84, 95% CI 4.45-11.92) during morning shift periods. No associations were found between chronotype, sleep and need for recovery during evening and night shift periods. For age, no associations were found with any of the shift-specific outcome measures. The results stress the importance of including the concept of chronotype in shift work research and scheduling beyond the concept of age. Longitudinal research using shift-specific assessments of sleep and need for recovery are needed to confirm these results.Practitioner Summary: Chronotype seems to better explain individual differences in sleep than age. In view of ageing societies, it might therefore be worthwhile to further examine the application of chronotype for individualised shift work schedules to facilitate healthy and sustainable employment.
机译：这项研究在N = 261名工业轮班工人（男性占96.6％）的一项横断面研究中，检验了表型和年龄与轮班特定的主要睡眠时间，睡眠质量和恢复需求的相关性。使用逻辑回归分析，并针对性别，生活方式，健康状况，小睡行为，评估季节和轮班时间表进行了调整。上班时间最晚的轮班工人报告说，在早上上班期间，睡眠时间较短（OR 11.68，95％CI 3.31-41.17），觉醒投诉较多（OR 4.84，95％CI 4.45-11.92）。在晚上和夜班期间，没有发现表型，睡眠和恢复需要之间的关联。对于年龄，没有发现与任何特定于轮班的结局指标相关。研究结果强调了将年龄型概念纳入轮班工作研究和超越年龄概念的日程安排的重要性。需要使用针对班次的睡眠评估和恢复需求进行纵向研究，以证实这些结果。从业者总结：计时表型似乎比年龄更好地解释了睡眠中的个体差异。鉴于老龄化社会，因此有必要进一步研究表型在个性化轮班时间表中的应用，以促进健康和可持续的就业。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ergonomics》 |2016年第2期|310-324|共15页
  • 作者

    van de Ven Hardy A.; van der Klink Jac J. L.; Vetter Celine; Roenneberg Till; Gordijn Marijke; Koolhaas Wendy; de Looze Michiel P.; Brouwer Sandra; Bultmann Ute;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Community & Occupat Med, Groningen, Netherlands;

    Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Community & Occupat Med, Groningen, Netherlands;

    Brigham & Womens Hosp, Channing Div Network Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA|Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA|Univ Munich, Inst Med Psychol, D-80539 Munich, Germany;

    Univ Munich, Inst Med Psychol, D-80539 Munich, Germany;

    Univ Groningen, GELIFES, Chronobiol Unit, Groningen, Netherlands;

    Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Community & Occupat Med, Groningen, Netherlands;

    TNO, Leiden, Netherlands|Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands;

    Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Community & Occupat Med, Groningen, Netherlands;

    Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Community & Occupat Med, Groningen, Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    work schedule tolerance; Munich Chronotype Questionnaire; shift work; circadian rhythm;

    机译：工作时间表的耐受性;慕尼黑式分型问卷;轮班工作;昼夜节律;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号