...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >Crisis and opportunity: Varieties of capitalism and varieties of crisis responses in Estonia and Slovenia
【24h】

Crisis and opportunity: Varieties of capitalism and varieties of crisis responses in Estonia and Slovenia

机译：危机与机遇：爱沙尼亚和斯洛文尼亚的各种资本主义和危机应对措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A growing literature has analysed capitalist institutions in Slovenia and Estonia, two countries often viewed as representing very different varieties of capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Slovenia has been unique in the region, given its highly centralized wage bargaining and the importance of corporatist institutions, notably the tripartite Economic and Social Council; it is thus an exception to the general pattern of weak unions and illusory corporatism' across the region. By contrast, Estonia is commonly viewed as a prime example of a liberal market economy, in which industrial relations are decentralized. This article analyses how these distinctive institutional configurations have shaped the two countries' responses to the global economic crisis beginning in 2007-2008. It explores whether these institutions have undergone changes as a result of the crisis, and also seeks to identify lessons from this experience for the future prospects for corporatism and tripartism, and also for the revitalization of trade unions and progressive politics in Central and Eastern Europe more generally.
机译：越来越多的文献对斯洛文尼亚和爱沙尼亚的资本主义制度进行了分析，斯洛文尼亚和爱沙尼亚这两个国家经常被视为代表中欧和东欧资本主义的非常不同的品种。斯洛文尼亚在该地区是独一无二的，因为其高度集中的工资谈判和法人团体的重要性，尤其是三方经济及社会理事会。因此，这是整个地区弱联合和虚幻的社团主义的普遍模式的一个例外。相比之下，爱沙尼亚通常被视为自由市场经济的主要例子，在这种市场中，劳资关系是分散的。本文分析了这些独特的制度配置如何塑造了两国对2007-2008年开始的全球经济危机的应对。它探讨了这些机构是否因危机而发生了变化，并试图从这一经验中吸取教训，以了解社团主义和三方性的未来前景，以及中欧和东欧的工会复兴和政治进步。通常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号