• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation and program planning >Assumptions at the philosophical and programmatic levels in evaluation
【24h】

Assumptions at the philosophical and programmatic levels in evaluation

机译：评价中的哲学和程序层面的假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Stakeholders and evaluators hold a variety of levels of assumptions at the philosophical, methodological, and programmatic levels. The use of a transformative philosophical framework is presented as a way for evaluators to become more aware of the implications of various assumptions made by themselves and program stakeholders. The argument is examined and demonstrated that evaluators who are aware of the assumptions that underlie their evaluation choices are able to provide useful support for stakeholders in the examination of the assumptions they hold with regard to the nature of the problem being addressed, the program designed to solve the problem, and the approach to evaluation that is appropriate in that context. Such an informed approach has the potential for development of more appropriate and culturally responsive programs being implemented in ways that lead to the desired impacts, as well as to lead to evaluation approaches that support effective solutions to intransigent social problems. These arguments are illustrated through examples of evaluations from multiple sectors; additional challenges are also identified. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：利益相关者和评估者在哲学，方法论和程序性层面上具有各种不同的假设级别。提出了使用变革性哲学框架的方法，以使评估人员更加了解自己和计划利益相关者做出的各种假设的含义。检验并论证了该论点，即，了解其评估选择基础的假设的评估者能够为利益相关者提供关于他们所要解决的问题性质的假设的有用支持，该计划旨在解决问题，以及在这种情况下合适的评估方法。这种知情的方法有可能制定出更适当的和具有文化响应性的方案，以导致期望的影响的方式实施，并导致形成评估方法，以支持对顽固的社会问题的有效解决方案。通过多个部门的评估示例说明了这些论点。还确定了其他挑战。 （C）2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号