...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Facilities >Facilities management: lost, or regained?
【24h】

Facilities management: lost, or regained?

机译：设施管理：丢失还是重新获得？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The objective of this paper is to examine the continuing debate over the nature, scope and definition of facilities management and the implications of FM practice in the field of outsourcing for the development of the field and the profession. Design/methodology/approach - The paper offers both a conceptual review of key issues in the definition of facilities management and a critique of these definitions in the context of the popular identity of facilities management as a means of generating cost savings through outsourcing. Findings - The discussion asserts that, perhaps contrary to the many published doubts expressed over the possibility of achieving consensus on the scope of facilities management, an emerging and broadly consensual model of facilities management can be discerned. This model, it is suggested, is inhibited from further development primarily because of a lack of leadership in the professional and academic communities together with a preoccupation by necessity of the FM profession with operational imperatives. Originality/value - The paper, through synthesis and critique, offers a variant perspective on the debate about the nature of facilities management.
机译：目的-本文的目的是研究关于设施管理的性质，范围和定义的持续辩论，以及FM实践在外包领域对该领域和专业发展的影响。设计/方法/方法-本文既对设施管理定义中的关键问题进行了概念性回顾，又对设施管理的普遍认同进行了批判，以通过外包来节省成本。调查结果：讨论断言，也许与许多已发表的关于就设施管理范围达成共识的可能性表示怀疑的观点相反，可以看到一种新兴的，广泛共识的设施管理模型。有人建议，这种模式的进一步发展受到阻碍，这主要是因为在专业和学术界缺乏领导力，以及由于FM行业必须要有业务上的必要性。原创性/价值-通过综合和批判，本文对设施管理的性质提出了不同的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号